emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Xiamen University of Technology - XMUT vs Xiamen University - XMU vs L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique

Side-by-side comparison from 201 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: emlyon business school (4.50)
emlyon business school: wins 5/6 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 1/6 categories
Xiamen University of Technology - XMUT: wins 0/6 categories
Xiamen University - XMU: wins 0/6 categories
L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique: wins 0/6 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Lishui University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Philosophy
Best programme: Art and Design
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Lishui, Zhejiang, China
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
Win
4.21
Not rated
2.50
4.00
3.43
Not rated
Location
4.66
Win
4.25
Not rated
2.00
3.00
4.64
Not rated
Professors
4.12
4.42
Win
Not rated
3.50
4.00
3.86
Not rated
Internationality
4.63
Win
4.36
Not rated
3.50
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Student life
4.30
Win
4.11
Not rated
3.00
3.00
4.07
Not rated
Value
4.49
Win
4.03
Not rated
3.00
4.00
3.64
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
3.57
Not rated
3.50
4.00
2.50
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +strong international exposure & opportunities
  • +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
  • +valuable alumni network & career support

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent learning environment and broad academic opportunities
  • +Strong programs in Oceanography, Industrial Sciences, and Economics
  • +Diverse professional subjects across Science, Liberal Arts, and Engineering
  • +Supportive environment & welcoming community
  • +Prestigious European university for design
  • +Focus on practical application over theory
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
  • -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Racism and bullying are experienced by international students.
  • -Lack of support for students in distress is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum create learning difficulties.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.

Nothing to show

This university presents a mixed bag of ratings. Its strongest aspects lie in its accommodations, internationality, and professor quality, all scoring a solid 3.5. Student life and value also received respectable scores of 3. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are its facilities, with a score of 2.5, and its location, which received the lowest rating of 2.

Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its facilities, professor quality, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a strong rating of 4. While student life and location are rated a respectable 3, these areas represent opportunities for improvement compared to its more robust aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive offering.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.

Nothing to show

One out of two reviews was positive, citing a great learning environment and diverse opportunities. The other review, representing approximately 50% of feedback, was negative and described experiences of racism and difficult administration for international students.

The university receives strong positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being positive. Students highlight a welcoming environment for international students and supportive teachers. Some desire more challenging main projects and theoretical lectures.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
49%
0%
50%
0%
21%
0%
4★
27%
42%
0%
0%
100%
50%
0%
3★
10%
7%
100%
0%
0%
43%
0%
2★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close