emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Hult International Business School vs Nottingham University Business School - NUBS vs INSEEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 270 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
- +International experience and career support
- +Strong networking and career opportunities
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Supportive and experienced faculty
- +Experienced lecturers and impactful degrees
- +Diverse community and enriching social experiences
- +Engaging courses and broad academic options
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +supportive teachers and valuable academic guidance
- +vibrant international community and diverse student body
- +positive and fun college experience
- +Supportive learning environment
- +Competent and friendly teachers
- +Real-world art curriculum
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
- -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
- -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient materials are a concern.
- -Inconsistent professor quality and teaching methods are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of effective teaching and uninspired course content are major drawbacks.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Excessive administrative and communication problems.
- -Lack of resources and outdated facilities.
- -Poor teaching quality and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and responsiveness from staff is a consistent problem.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.
With high scores across most aspects, this institution excels in **Internationality** (4.79) and **Location** (4.61). Professors also receive strong marks (4.49). The weakest area for the university is **Accomodation**, which received a considerably lower rating (3.29) compared to other surveyed categories. Facilities (4.16), Student Life (4.20), and Value (4.15) fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution excels significantly in its location, student life, and internationality, all receiving a perfect 4.8. Facilities also score well at 4.4. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, with a rating of 3.6, and professors, scoring 3.8. Overall, the university offers strong value at 4.2, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
This institution receives strong praise for its vibrant student life, achieving a high rating of 4.6. Professors are also well-regarded at 4.4. Areas needing improvement, however, include internationality, with a lower score of 3.8, indicating potential for growth in global engagement. Other categories like facilities, location, accommodation, and value all score a solid 4.2.
This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas, notably its **professors, location, student life, and internationality, all receiving perfect marks**. Facilities are also well-regarded. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3. Overall, the university presents a very strong offering, with value for money also rated positively.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback highlights excellent career opportunities, networking, and practical learning experiences. A small percentage of reviews mention issues with professor quality and program materials.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praised the enjoyable experience, experienced lecturers, spacious campus, and career-shaping degrees. They also highlighted engaging courses, diverse communities, and numerous extracurricular activities.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 4.2/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise teachers, friends, and international life, noting enjoyable college years and skilled academic support. No negative feedback was provided.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university is highly praised by its sole reviewer. They highlight the supportive learning environment and competent, friendly teachers, particularly for foreign students.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
One of my favourite aspects about Hult is its diversity. By meeting people from all over the world with diverse histories and customs, you can get a sense of what their home nations are like. I also enjoy the help the staff provides every step of the way.
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
