emlyon business school vs Universitè Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - UCBL1 vs Burgundy School of Business vs Jean Moulin University Lyon III vs INSEEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 94 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body
- +Opportunities for professional development and real-world experience
- +Strong academic programs and supportive resources
- +Strong science and technology programs
- +Supportive professors and academic environment
- +Diverse student body
- +Experienced and approachable instructors
- +Practical, relevant curriculum
- +Supportive environment and good location
- +Dedicated teaching staff and effective student support
- +Strong academic programs for success
- +Skill development and career preparation
- +Supportive and multicultural learning environment
- +Practical application of knowledge
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Lack of practical value in coursework and insufficient learning.
- -Frustrating and unfair grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program management.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Communication from staff is often poor and unhelpful.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder program quality.
- -Program value is not commensurate with the high tuition fees.
- -Poor communication and administrative support are frequent frustrations.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are often cited.
- -The curriculum can be irrelevant, poorly structured, or lacking in practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and course content leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in both **Internationality** (4.59) and **Location** (4.57), indicating excellent global engagement and a desirable setting. **Value** for money is also highly rated (4.41). The weakest area is **Accomodation**, scoring the lowest at 3.94, though other aspects like Student Life (4.25) and Facilities (4.15) remain solid. Professors also receive a respectable rating of 4.06.
This institution scores exceptionally well in several key areas, notably in **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value**, all receiving a rating of 4.67. **Professors** and **Location** also garnered strong scores. However, **Student Life** emerged as a significantly weaker aspect, with a rating of 2.33. **Internationality** received a moderate rating of 3.33.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks at 4.44. Professors and student life also scored very well, both at 4.22. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 3.56 and 3.63 respectively. The university shows a moderate performance in internationality and value.
A consistent, positive assessment emerges from these university ratings, with notable strengths in **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all scoring an excellent 4.67. **Location** also scores highly at 4.33. The **Student Life** and **Accomodation** categories are rated a solid 4. Among the surveyed areas, **Facilities** received the lowest rating at 3.67.
This institution garners high marks for its location and internationality, both scoring an impressive 4.62. Professors and student life also received solid ratings of 4.00 and 4.10 respectively. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, rated at 3.57, and accommodation, which received a 3.25. Value for money is assessed at 3.76, indicating a generally positive but not outstanding performance.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~98%), praising academic rigor, practical application, and international diversity. A small percentage (~2%) expressed disappointment with course content and grading fairness.
With an average rating of 4/5 based on 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise good facilities, well-equipped libraries, and a conducive environment, though some note older buildings and a serious atmosphere.
The majority of reviews (~89%) are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, practical courses, and a supportive environment. A small amount of negative feedback (~11%) exists, with one reviewer feeling the cost was not justified.
With a ~67% positive sentiment, students praise excellent teaching and a supportive environment conducive to success. No negative feedback was recorded.
With 16 out of 23 reviews being positive (~74%), students highlight strong program content and professional preparation. They appreciate skill development and practical application, alongside a friendly atmosphere and helpful professors.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university itself is a bit outdated and the atmosphere can be quite serious. It can be difficult to enjoy the social aspect of university life when you're focused on a demanding academic program. However, it's important to remember that there is a diverse group of students at the university, with a variety of backgrounds and interests. It's possible to find a niche and connect with like-minded people, even in a more traditional academic environment.
As an international student attending the MBA WINE AND SPIRITS BUSINESS program and spending 32 thousand euros (besides the need of quitting my job, move, find an accommodation and change lifestyle) I would say that the school is worth less then half of what it costs. The only good aspects of it are the big students’ communities, the commitment of the international office and the quality of some teachers who cannot really give their best because they’re hampered by the strict organisation of the school programs. Administration, services and the overall school organisation are really below expectations and the educational level is just average despite the cost and the “reputation”. Everyone (classmates, other international students and french ones from all courses and years) complained about the fact that “the school used to be a good one, but now is just bad”!
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
