emlyon business school vs Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML vs ESSCA School of Management vs INSEEC Business School vs CEFAM Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 105 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Practical application and industry relevance
- +Diverse academic programs and extensive choices
- +Supportive environment and accessible services
- +Strong marketing & business programs
- +Excellent student support & community
- +Diverse academic pathways & practical experience
- +Diverse and multicultural atmosphere with approachable professors and quality teaching.
- +Strong support for work-study placements and professional integration.
- +Practical, hands-on learning experiences and networking opportunities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Poor communication and unhelpful administrative staff are frustrating.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content feels irrelevant and not aligned with current industry needs.
- -Unprepared and unhelpful professors with poor communication.
- -Irrelevant and outdated courses with a lack of student engagement.
- -Significant administrative and organizational issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and is poorly delivered.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This institution shines with outstanding ratings in its facilities and location, both receiving a near-perfect score. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring above 4.3. However, the ratings indicate professors are the weakest area, with a score of 3, while the overall value is rated a respectable 4.
This institution presents a mixed picture in its evaluations. It shines brightest in **Location**, achieving a score of over 4.1, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.07 and **Professors** at 3.9. Conversely, **Accomodation** is its least favored aspect, with a rating of 3.37. The university also garners solid marks in Internationality and Value.
Performance across surveyed categories shows a diverse range of feedback. The university excels particularly in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving exceptionally high scores. In contrast, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Value are rated moderately well, indicating room for improvement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
With a 3.67 average rating from 3 reviews, feedback is mostly positive (~67%). Students highlight strong academic programs and diverse educational opportunities. No negative reviews were submitted.
With ~87% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.93/5, students praise good knowledge transfer, specialization options, internship access, and vibrant campus life. A small portion of reviews mention unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 67% of students rating it highly. Recurring themes include a friendly, multicultural atmosphere, supportive professors, and excellent preparation for professional life through practical experiences and group projects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
