Universidade de Brasília - UnB vs SKEMA Business School vs Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG vs Centro Universitário de Brasília - UniCEUB vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 169 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality teaching and dedicated professors
- +Well-structured academic programs and diverse opportunities
- +Strong sense of community and personal growth
- +Strong academic programmes with practical application
- +Excellent opportunities for skill development and networking
- +Valuable international exposure and alumni support
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Strong preparation for the job market and career readiness
- +Excellent facilities and a welcoming academic environment
- +Excellent infrastructure and modern facilities
- +Highly qualified and accomplished faculty
- +Strong employability and diploma recognition
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Nothing to show
- +dedicated and knowledgeable professors
- +strong academic quality
- +good teaching methods
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
- -Teaching faculty and their perceived focus on profit over education are criticized.
- -Guidance for career goals and clarity on doubts are lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas. Its location and value are particularly outstanding, both receiving top scores. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. Conversely, facilities and accommodation present the weakest aspects, with scores indicating room for improvement. The quality of professors is a clear strength.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors** (4.41), **Internationality** (4.36), and **Location** (4.25). **Facilities** (4.21) and **Student Life** (4.11) also receive favorable scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 3.58, while **Value** sits at 4.04.
This institution receives its highest marks for Value, with an impressive score. Location also stands out as a significant strength. Areas requiring the most improvement are Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings. Facilities and Professors are rated similarly well, while Student Life falls in the middle range.
With a generally positive performance, this institution excels in its facilities, location, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a solid 3.8 rating. Professors are also highly regarded at 4.0. However, student life presents a slightly weaker area at 3.6, and value for money is the lowest rated aspect at 3.4, indicating room for improvement in these domains.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Nothing to show
This institution receives top marks for its **professors and location**, both scoring a perfect 5. Student life and overall value are also highly rated at 4 and 4.5 respectively. Areas for improvement include facilities, accommodation, and internationality, which all received a 3.5 rating.
8 out of 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise strong professors, good academic structure, and valuable opportunities. Minor concerns include bureaucracy and campus distances.
Over 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting student associations, international opportunities, and practical skills for careers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and course organization.
With an average rating of 4.56/5, nearly all (~100%) of the 9 reviews are positive, praising excellent teaching quality, dedicated professors, and strong preparation for the job market. A slight suggestion for more professional education was mentioned.
With a 4/5 average rating, reviews indicate strong positive sentiment (~67%) regarding excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty. Employability and diploma recognition are also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
With a 4.5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight academic quality and professor dedication. Some suggest campus infrastructure improvements.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
