Universidade de Brasília - UnB vs SKEMA Business School vs Centro Universitário de Brasília - UniCEUB vs Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS vs Centro Universitário do Distrito Federal
Side-by-side comparison from 174 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality teaching and dedicated professors
- +Well-structured academic programs and diverse opportunities
- +Strong sense of community and personal growth
- +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
- +International experience and career support
- +Excellent faculty and practical learning
- +Strong academic programs and career opportunities
- +Modern infrastructure and resources
- +Experienced professors with practical application
- +Accessible and diverse learning opportunities
- +Quality education meeting student expectations
Nothing to show
- +Inclusive and diverse student community
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +High-quality and relevant academic programs
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
- -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
- -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
- -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
- -Students dislike administrative inefficiencies and poor communication.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are major concerns.
- -There are recurring complaints about instructor quality and course content.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common frustrations.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a significant concern.
Nothing to show
This institution garners high marks in several key areas. Its location and value are particularly outstanding, both receiving top scores. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. Conversely, facilities and accommodation present the weakest aspects, with scores indicating room for improvement. The quality of professors is a clear strength.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.
The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with its **location** standing out as the strongest aspect, achieving a high rating of 4. Conversely, **student life**, **internationality**, and **value** are identified as the weakest areas, each receiving a rating of 3.5. Facilities and accommodation also scored well at 3.75, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This university receives its highest marks for Professors (4.32) and Value (4.25). Location (4.08) and Student Life (4.00) also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation (3.04) and Internationality (3.36) represent the weakest areas, with Facilities (3.58) falling in the middle. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in academic quality and financial benefit, while improvements may be considered in student living arrangements and global engagement.
Nothing to show
This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. It shines with perfect marks for its professors and student life, and boasts high ratings in internationality, facilities, location, and accommodation. The sole area receiving a comparatively lower score, though still strong, is its overall value.
Nothing to show
8 out of 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise strong professors, good academic structure, and valuable opportunities. Minor concerns include bureaucracy and campus distances.
With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 5 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent infrastructure, modern facilities, and highly qualified faculty. The curriculum is noted for opening career opportunities.
Students highly recommend this university, with ~93% of feedback being positive. Recurring themes include dedicated, practical professors and valuable learning opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~7%) mentions infrastructure needing maintenance.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted inclusive learning environments and supportive faculty. Excellent infrastructure and a relevant curriculum were also noted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
