Université de Bourgogne - UB vs Audencia Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Burgundy School of Business vs Clermont School of Business

Side-by-side comparison from 169 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ONCAMPUS Global (4.80)
Université de Bourgogne - UB: wins 0/7 categories
Audencia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 7/7 categories
Burgundy School of Business: wins 0/7 categories
Clermont School of Business: wins 0/7 categories
School of Wine & Spirits Business: wins 0/7 categories
CESI: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Master in Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Best programme: Banking
Clermont-Ferrand, France
4.50
Read more reviews
84 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor in International Management
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.05
4.44
Win
3.63
4.27
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.70
4.06
4.75
Win
4.44
4.42
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.97
4.14
4.76
Win
4.22
4.37
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.06
4.43
4.62
Win
3.78
4.61
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.09
4.05
4.58
Win
4.22
4.38
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.10
4.52
Win
3.78
4.30
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.84
3.60
4.35
Win
3.56
4.10
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical skill development and personal growth
  • +Welcoming and inspiring campus environment
  • +Strong professors and diverse international student community.
  • +Excellent facilities and good class scheduling.
  • +Beneficial business programs and city amenities.
  • +Supportive and approachable teachers
  • +Excellent student support services
  • +Convenient campus location and facilities
  • +Experienced and approachable instructors
  • +Practical, relevant curriculum
  • +Supportive environment and good location
  • +modern facilities and organization
  • +international environment and diverse student body
  • +quality teaching and practical learning experiences

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of practical tools.
  • -Disengaged professors unwilling to accept feedback.
  • -Limited opportunities for student interaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
  • -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder program quality.
  • -Program value is not commensurate with the high tuition fees.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of relevant coursework.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including lack of student support.
  • -Overloaded schedules and insufficient opportunities for independent learning or skill development.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Performance shows a very strong showing in Student Life and Internationality, both scoring over 4.0. Facilities and Value also received high marks, hitting a 4.0 average. The university's weakest area is Professors, with a rating just under 4.0.

This institution demonstrates strong internationality, achieving its highest rating in this area. Professors are also highly regarded. While most categories received positive feedback, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, with a noticeably lower score compared to other aspects. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its global appeal and academic staff.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks at 4.44. Professors and student life also scored very well, both at 4.22. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 3.56 and 3.63 respectively. The university shows a moderate performance in internationality and value.

This university garners positive feedback across multiple aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area, achieving a rating of 4.61. **Location** also received high marks at 4.42. Conversely, **Accommodations** present the weakest area, scoring 4.10. Other categories such as Professors, Student Life, and Value all fall within a closely clustered range of 4.30 to 4.37, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~100% positive feedback from 34 reviews and an average rating of 4.03/5, students highlight respected faculty, practical programs, and an inclusive campus culture. No negative reviews were provided.

The vast majority of university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, facilities, and diverse international community. A small percentage of feedback expresses disappointment with practical training and professor engagement.

All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.

The majority of reviews (~89%) are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, practical courses, and a supportive environment. A small amount of negative feedback (~11%) exists, with one reviewer feeling the cost was not justified.

~95% of reviews are positive, praising modern facilities, international environment, and practical learning. A small minority, ~5%, express disappointment with teaching quality and program relevance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
18%
29%
76%
33%
62%
0%
0%
4★
68%
67%
24%
33%
29%
0%
0%
3★
15%
0%
0%
22%
5%
0%
0%
2★
0%
5%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
11%
2%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Focus on multicultural business management

I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.

Nothing to show

Just a big NO-NO

As an international student attending the MBA WINE AND SPIRITS BUSINESS program and spending 32 thousand euros (besides the need of quitting my job, move, find an accommodation and change lifestyle) I would say that the school is worth less then half of what it costs. The only good aspects of it are the big students’ communities, the commitment of the international office and the quality of some teachers who cannot really give their best because they’re hampered by the strict organisation of the school programs. Administration, services and the overall school organisation are really below expectations and the educational level is just average despite the cost and the “reputation”. Everyone (classmates, other international students and french ones from all courses and years) complained about the fact that “the school used to be a good one, but now is just bad”!

Course - Corporate Finance and fintech

The course itself was great as it gave me ideas into a new world and now i have a better understanding and the know-how in fintech. Overall, teaching staff are professionnel and supporting in ensuring we get the best out of our time there

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close