Sciences Po vs Université de Bourgogne - UB vs Audencia Business School vs Burgundy School of Business vs School of Wine & Spirits Business
Side-by-side comparison from 128 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary curriculum and diverse academic focus
- +Networking opportunities and career prospects
- +Vibrant student life and diverse community
- +Dedicated and knowledgeable faculty
- +Practical skill development and personal growth
- +Welcoming and inspiring campus environment
- +Strong professors and diverse international student community.
- +Excellent facilities and good class scheduling.
- +Beneficial business programs and city amenities.
- +Experienced and approachable instructors
- +Practical, relevant curriculum
- +Supportive environment and good location
Nothing to show
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
Nothing to show
- -Academics are often ineffective and lack preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Facilities are perceived as outdated and insufficient.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of practical tools.
- -Disengaged professors unwilling to accept feedback.
- -Limited opportunities for student interaction.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder program quality.
- -Program value is not commensurate with the high tuition fees.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
- -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
Nothing to show
This university garners impressive scores, particularly for its **Internationality**, which stands out at 4.7. **Location** and **Value** also score very highly, both at 4.39. Student life and professors also received strong ratings above 4.2. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.16, while facilities are rated at 3.83.
Performance shows a very strong showing in Student Life and Internationality, both scoring over 4.0. Facilities and Value also received high marks, hitting a 4.0 average. The university's weakest area is Professors, with a rating just under 4.0.
This institution demonstrates strong internationality, achieving its highest rating in this area. Professors are also highly regarded. While most categories received positive feedback, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, with a noticeably lower score compared to other aspects. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its global appeal and academic staff.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks at 4.44. Professors and student life also scored very well, both at 4.22. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 3.56 and 3.63 respectively. The university shows a moderate performance in internationality and value.
Nothing to show
This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.
Nothing to show
With ~96% positive feedback and an average 4.08/5 rating, students praise the interdisciplinary curriculum, academic excellence, and vibrant student life. A small ~4% of reviews express disappointment with specific academic approaches.
With ~100% positive feedback from 34 reviews and an average rating of 4.03/5, students highlight respected faculty, practical programs, and an inclusive campus culture. No negative reviews were provided.
The vast majority of university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, facilities, and diverse international community. A small percentage of feedback expresses disappointment with practical training and professor engagement.
The majority of reviews (~89%) are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, practical courses, and a supportive environment. A small amount of negative feedback (~11%) exists, with one reviewer feeling the cost was not justified.
Nothing to show
The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.
Nothing to show
I'm an exchange student in the Reims campus in the academic year of 2023-2024. I think this campus is good for an exchange experience because there are a lot of exchange students and even the french people who come to the grad school don't live in Reims, so basically everyone on the campus is new to the city and wants to form a bond. In terms of academic experience, I think Sciences Po system is really controlling. Their attendance policy is really strict and all the classes have an assignment for the week, either a presentation or an evaluation, which makes the semester exhausting since the beginning. Also, I didn't like the fact that in some classes there are only presentations made by students and no later explanation by the professor. I don't like this method because I think the students only focus on preparing their presentation and we don't really pay attention to the presentation of the other classmates as much as we would pay as if the professor was presenting. To summarize, I still love some of my classes, but I had higher expectations about Sciences Po's method, since it's the best political sciences university in Europe, which made me a little disappointed.
Nothing to show
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
As an international student attending the MBA WINE AND SPIRITS BUSINESS program and spending 32 thousand euros (besides the need of quitting my job, move, find an accommodation and change lifestyle) I would say that the school is worth less then half of what it costs. The only good aspects of it are the big students’ communities, the commitment of the international office and the quality of some teachers who cannot really give their best because they’re hampered by the strict organisation of the school programs. Administration, services and the overall school organisation are really below expectations and the educational level is just average despite the cost and the “reputation”. Everyone (classmates, other international students and french ones from all courses and years) complained about the fact that “the school used to be a good one, but now is just bad”!
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
