Sciences Po vs Université de Bourgogne - UB vs Audencia Business School vs Burgundy School of Business vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 180 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary curriculum and diverse academic focus
- +Networking opportunities and career prospects
- +Vibrant student life and diverse community
- +Dedicated and knowledgeable faculty
- +Practical skill development and personal growth
- +Welcoming and inspiring campus environment
- +Strong professors and diverse international student community.
- +Excellent facilities and good class scheduling.
- +Beneficial business programs and city amenities.
- +Experienced and approachable instructors
- +Practical, relevant curriculum
- +Supportive environment and good location
- +Practical learning, internships, and experienced instructors.
- +International exposure and multicultural environment.
- +High-quality teaching and good course content.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Academics are often ineffective and lack preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Facilities are perceived as outdated and insufficient.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of practical tools.
- -Disengaged professors unwilling to accept feedback.
- -Limited opportunities for student interaction.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder program quality.
- -Program value is not commensurate with the high tuition fees.
- -Superficial academic content and lack of practical value.
- -Ineffective career support, including internships and apprenticeships.
- -Courses not aligning with student expectations or career goals.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university garners impressive scores, particularly for its **Internationality**, which stands out at 4.7. **Location** and **Value** also score very highly, both at 4.39. Student life and professors also received strong ratings above 4.2. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.16, while facilities are rated at 3.83.
Performance shows a very strong showing in Student Life and Internationality, both scoring over 4.0. Facilities and Value also received high marks, hitting a 4.0 average. The university's weakest area is Professors, with a rating just under 4.0.
This institution demonstrates strong internationality, achieving its highest rating in this area. Professors are also highly regarded. While most categories received positive feedback, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, with a noticeably lower score compared to other aspects. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its global appeal and academic staff.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks at 4.44. Professors and student life also scored very well, both at 4.22. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 3.56 and 3.63 respectively. The university shows a moderate performance in internationality and value.
Performing exceptionally well, this university boasts its strongest ratings in **Location** (4.30) and **Internationality** (4.30), closely followed by **Student Life** (4.25). Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score at 3.66, and **Professors** and **Value**, both rated at 3.91. The **Facilities** score stands at a respectable 4.02.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With ~96% positive feedback and an average 4.08/5 rating, students praise the interdisciplinary curriculum, academic excellence, and vibrant student life. A small ~4% of reviews express disappointment with specific academic approaches.
With ~100% positive feedback from 34 reviews and an average rating of 4.03/5, students highlight respected faculty, practical programs, and an inclusive campus culture. No negative reviews were provided.
The vast majority of university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, facilities, and diverse international community. A small percentage of feedback expresses disappointment with practical training and professor engagement.
The majority of reviews (~89%) are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, practical courses, and a supportive environment. A small amount of negative feedback (~11%) exists, with one reviewer feeling the cost was not justified.
With a 4.07/5 average, ~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting international opportunities, practical learning, and a multicultural environment. A small ~4.5% of feedback is negative, citing superficial course coverage and limited practical value.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I'm an exchange student in the Reims campus in the academic year of 2023-2024. I think this campus is good for an exchange experience because there are a lot of exchange students and even the french people who come to the grad school don't live in Reims, so basically everyone on the campus is new to the city and wants to form a bond. In terms of academic experience, I think Sciences Po system is really controlling. Their attendance policy is really strict and all the classes have an assignment for the week, either a presentation or an evaluation, which makes the semester exhausting since the beginning. Also, I didn't like the fact that in some classes there are only presentations made by students and no later explanation by the professor. I don't like this method because I think the students only focus on preparing their presentation and we don't really pay attention to the presentation of the other classmates as much as we would pay as if the professor was presenting. To summarize, I still love some of my classes, but I had higher expectations about Sciences Po's method, since it's the best political sciences university in Europe, which made me a little disappointed.
Nothing to show
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
As an international student attending the MBA WINE AND SPIRITS BUSINESS program and spending 32 thousand euros (besides the need of quitting my job, move, find an accommodation and change lifestyle) I would say that the school is worth less then half of what it costs. The only good aspects of it are the big students’ communities, the commitment of the international office and the quality of some teachers who cannot really give their best because they’re hampered by the strict organisation of the school programs. Administration, services and the overall school organisation are really below expectations and the educational level is just average despite the cost and the “reputation”. Everyone (classmates, other international students and french ones from all courses and years) complained about the fact that “the school used to be a good one, but now is just bad”!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
