IÉSEG School of Management vs SKEMA Business School vs INSEAD Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs ESCE Paris International Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 465 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international community and global opportunities
- +Supportive professors and active student associations
- +strong international exposure & opportunities
- +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
- +valuable alumni network & career support
- +High-quality faculty and relevant curriculum
- +Diverse and international peer community
- +Practical learning and career opportunities
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Engaging and challenging academic programs taught by industry professionals
- +Supportive staff and personalized learning experiences
- +International focus and diverse student body
- +Supportive and engaging faculty
- +Dynamic student life and activities
- +High academic standards and professional faculty
- +Focus on holistic development, including values and social impact
- +Rigorous and structured learning environment
- -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
- -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of effective communication and support leaves students feeling ignored.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a frequent concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and transparency from instructors is a common complaint.
This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.
A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.
With exceptional scores, this institution excels in its professorial staff, earning a near-perfect 4.7. Accommodation and value are also highly rated, both exceeding 4.5. The university demonstrates strong international appeal and impressive facilities, each scoring 4.4. Student life is solid at 4.0. The location, however, is the lowest-rated aspect at 3.7.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, professors, and location, all scoring an impressive 4.75. Student life and value are also well-regarded at 4.25, with internationality close behind at 4.5. The weakest area of performance is accommodation, receiving a rating of 3.5. Overall, the university demonstrates significant strengths in its core offerings and campus environment.
A review of university ratings reveals a well-rounded institution. The strongest aspects appear to be Location and Internationality, both scoring above 4.3. Professors and Value are also highly rated, at 4.17. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities and Accomodation, which received scores of approximately 3.9. Student Life sits at a solid 4.
The university's strongest aspect is its accommodation, receiving a perfect score. However, significant weaknesses are apparent across most other surveyed areas, with facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all scoring zero. This indicates considerable room for improvement in nearly all facets of the university experience outside of its housing provisions.
With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.
Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.
With a ~86% positive rating from 7 reviews, students highlight atmosphere, challenging programs, and learning new business skills. Some mention a packed curriculum and dislike of program location.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent international environments and engaging programs, often taught by experienced professionals. Some note a preference for in-person learning over online options.
Students highly praise the university's international environment, supportive professors, and dynamic student life. Approximately 83% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 5/5 and 100% positive feedback, students praise exceptional academic standards and dedicated faculty. They also highlight the university's focus on shaping empathetic humans with a commitment to social justice and positive global impact.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
like the atmosphere. Challenging program. Dislike the location of the program, too far away from city. The curriculum is very packed and the peers are very nice. Enjoying the program so far and defintely learning new business skills.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
In an MSc fast track program, I had the privilege of spending time a large and intensive period with each educator, including supporting staff. From core marketing classes to general soft skill and one on one meetings, a large sum went above and beyond what was expected. From moral, educational, in some cases emotional support, the staff laid down a foundation for me to grow and reach my truest potential. In their own personal capacities, each staff took a unique approach to part with their knowledge, wisdom, support and experience. From an educational perspective, the educators sparked curiosity, critical and analytical thinking in me, allowing me to look at the world of business, advertising and marketing in a new light. While some information may have come across as “far fetched” or “hard to believe” it showcased that the program wasn’t merely looking to scratch the surface, but project the future, years in advance. With majority of the courses I take, I found my own passion for the content, mounding it in a way that I could use, apply and consider in my professional career. However, at the core of my memorable experience was the personal contact I had with a large majority ESCE professional staff. They made me feel welcome, accepted, and seen, allowing me to voice my thoughts, my own experience, and knowledge. I believe my masters success would not be possible without the influence of all members at ESCE.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
