IÉSEG School of Management vs GEM Alpine Business School vs SKEMA Business School vs Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales - EHESS vs EDHEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 487 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international community and global opportunities
- +Supportive professors and active student associations
- +Diverse faculty and global insights
- +Innovative and relevant curriculum with real-world application
- +Strong networking and international opportunities
- +strong international exposure & opportunities
- +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
- +valuable alumni network & career support
- +Exceptional teaching quality from leading researchers.
- +Abundant, unique seminar options and easy professor access.
- +Personalized, autonomous study path with tutor guidance.
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
- +Practical experience and career advancement support
Nothing to show
- -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities are a consistent problem.
- -Administrative and management issues lead to disorganization and frustration.
- -Poor communication from the institution causes confusion and unmet expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
- -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -A lack of resources and support hinders learning.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
- -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
Nothing to show
This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance. Student life stands out as a particularly strong area, closely followed by professors and overall value. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. The university also scores well in facilities, internationality, and location.
A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.
This institution shines in its **facilities**, **professors**, and **internationality**, all receiving strong ratings. However, prospective students might note lower scores for **location**, **student life**, and **accommodation**. The overall **value** proposition sits in the middle, indicating a mixed but solid offering with clear strengths in academic and global aspects.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.
Nothing to show
With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.
With a 4.34/5 average rating from 50 reviews, ~90% are positive. Students praise the supportive environment, valuable faculty insights, and innovative, tech-aligned courses. Some highlight group work stress and limited exchange program admission.
Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, reviews are highly positive (~100%). Students praise the exceptional quality of teaching and seminars, noting outstanding professors and researchers. The autonomous, personalized study path is also highlighted.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.
Nothing to show
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Very good program offering rich training in different sectors of the commerce sector. The establishment has good infrastructure. She offers us good working materials for our projects. The Grenoble campus is not the best in France, but still very good There is a gym, classes, well equipped, amphitheatres, quite large and a beautiful cafeteria, it's not great luxury, but it has everything you need In our program, especially my year, we are lucky to have very good teachers who listen and who train us in an excellent way. This school nevertheless lacks international students compared to the top 5 of École de France, a business
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
Nothing to show
