IÉSEG School of Management vs emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global
Side-by-side comparison from 634 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Global campus network and diverse international experiences
- +Practical, hands-on, and comprehensive business curricula
- +Opportunities for personal and professional development
- +Outstanding teaching quality and practical, employer-aligned courses
- +Strong corporate network and valuable career services
- +Rigorous academics with practical industry insights
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Multicultural environment & international opportunities
- +High-quality teaching & experienced professors
- +Practical curriculum & relevant business programs
- +Practical application of knowledge and professional preparation
- +Supportive and multicultural learning environment
- +Quality teaching and personalized career support
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor communication and guidance
- -Ineffective teaching faculty
- -High tuition fees and perceived poor value for money are a major concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Superficial course content with a lack of depth and practical application.
- -Unprofessional training and insufficient support with internships and apprenticeships.
- -Misalignment between marketing specialization and business-oriented courses.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as uninspiring and ineffective.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This institution receives strong marks across multiple facets, particularly excelling in Internationality, with a rating of 4.43. Professors also garnered high praise at 4.38, closely followed by Location at 4.33. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the lowest-rated area, scoring 3.69, indicating a potential area for improvement. The university generally performs well, with an average rating above 4 for most categories.
The university excels in Internationality with a rating of 4.45, closely followed by its Professors at 4.32 and Facilities at 4.23. Student Life and Value also receive positive marks. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.21, with Location also being a moderate concern at 3.77. Overall, the institution demonstrates strengths in its academic and global offerings, while areas concerning student living arrangements and campus surroundings could see improvement.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring an impressive 4.31. Student life also receives high marks at 4.24. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest-rated aspect, coming in at 3.65. Professors and value are rated solid at around 3.9, with facilities also performing well at 4.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.6. Student life also receives a positive rating of 4.05. Areas for improvement are **Accomodation**, which is the lowest rated at approximately 3.16, and **Facilities** at 3.5. Professors are well-regarded with a 4.0 rating, and value for money is rated at 3.75.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
With a 4.37 average rating from 170 reviews, ~91% of students are positive. They praise demanding, hands-on programs, international opportunities, and professional/personal growth. A small percentage of feedback (~2.4%) noted poor management and communication.
With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 48 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, strong industry alignment, and excellent career services/alumni networks. One negative review mentioned high tuition fees.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
Approximately 95.4% of reviews are positive, highlighting multi-cultural environments, strong alumni networks, and good teaching quality. A small percentage of negative feedback mentioned a lack of depth in subjects and unprofessional training for the cost.
With an average rating of 3.95/5, ~74% of 22 reviews are positive. Students praise skill development, professional preparation, and a friendly atmosphere. Minimal negative feedback exists.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Nothing to show
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
