IÉSEG School of Management vs Université de Caen - UNICAEN vs emlyon business school vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Clermont School of Business
Side-by-side comparison from 482 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent campus and vibrant student life
- +Strong international community and engaging professors
- +Well-structured, competitive programs with real-world application
- +Supportive and engaged faculty
- +Vibrant student city and lively campus environment
- +Diverse programs and professional integration
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Practical, industry-relevant programmes
- +International environment and global opportunities
- +Inspiring professors and strong teaching quality
- +Excellent teaching quality and practical learning
- +Strong international environment and networking opportunities
- +Modern facilities and supportive career services
- +Practical learning, internships, and experienced instructors.
- +International exposure and multicultural environment.
- +High-quality teaching and good course content.
- +Practical and hands-on learning
- +Study abroad opportunities and international exposure
- +Professional and passionate professors
- -Last-minute changes create scheduling difficulties.
- -Lack of professor engagement and effort in improving classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt operations.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and lack of support frustrate students.
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Mediocre teaching and perceived lack of educational value.
- -The institution feels like a money-making scheme rather than a place of learning.
- -Poor teaching quality and incompetent professors are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of relevant curriculum and insufficient practical learning opportunities.
- -Disappointing administrative support, particularly for international students.
- -Superficial academic content and lack of practical value.
- -Ineffective career support, including internships and apprenticeships.
- -Courses not aligning with student expectations or career goals.
- -Inefficient administrative and management processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from instructors and the university is a common complaint.
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly in **Internationality** (4.56) and **Student Life** (4.45). **Location** also scores highly (4.42). The weakest area is **Accomodation**, receiving a rating of 3.93, while **Facilities** are slightly above this at 4.16. **Professors** and **Value** are rated competitively around 4.28 and 4.32 respectively.
With a generally strong showing, this university excels particularly in its **professors** and **location**, both earning an impressive 4.75. Student life and internationality also received high marks. However, the university's **accommodation** and **facilities** represent areas with room for improvement, scoring 3.5 and 3.75 respectively. Value for money is rated moderately.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This university achieves excellent scores in its facilities and internationality, both receiving a 4.22 rating. Professors are also highly regarded with a 4.11 score. Value for money is rated a solid 4. The weakest areas appear to be student life and accommodation, with ratings of 3.78 and 3.75 respectively, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback, with exceptionally high marks in **Internationality** (4.63) and **Location** (4.42). Student life and professor quality also received strong scores. The **Accomodation** (4.12) appears to be the relatively weakest area, though still rated favorably. The university demonstrates a solid reputation across diverse aspects of student experience.
Performing exceptionally well, this university boasts its strongest ratings in **Location** (4.30) and **Internationality** (4.30), closely followed by **Student Life** (4.25). Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score at 3.66, and **Professors** and **Value**, both rated at 3.91. The **Facilities** score stands at a respectable 4.02.
Across various aspects, this institution demonstrates a strong academic reputation. Professors are exceptionally rated at 4.7, with location and internationality also scoring highly at 4.3. Student life and accommodation are similarly rated at approximately 3.78, while facilities present the weakest area with a score of 3.9. Overall, the university offers good value at 4.2.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 256 reviews, approximately 99.2% are positive, praising campus life, international environment, and engaging classes. Very limited negative feedback notes concerns about course content and scheduling changes.
University of Caen Normandy receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%), with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise student life, diverse programs, and supportive services. Helpful teachers and engaging courses are recurring themes.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
About 78% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic and professional growth, practical application of knowledge, and an international environment. A single negative review criticized the institution as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Nearly 95% of reviews are positive, highlighting modern facilities, an international environment, and practical, well-taught courses. A small fraction of feedback expresses disappointment with some teaching quality and program relevance.
With a 4.07/5 average, ~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting international opportunities, practical learning, and a multicultural environment. A small ~4.5% of feedback is negative, citing superficial course coverage and limited practical value.
All ten reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight practical, dynamic classes, passionate professors, and beneficial study abroad programs that enhance skills and career prospects. There is no negative feedback.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The course itself was great as it gave me ideas into a new world and now i have a better understanding and the know-how in fintech. Overall, teaching staff are professionnel and supporting in ensuring we get the best out of our time there
Nothing to show
It's a good university but the classes are full, some of the teachers could have been more involved. However the university is well located, with many green spaces. The weather is very sunny, there is quite a bit public transports.
