University of Ghana - UG vs Macquarie University vs University of Education, Winneba vs Higher Institute Of Applied Science And Technology Of Sousse - ISSATSO vs Perez University College - PUC

Side-by-side comparison from 363 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Ghana - UG (4.30)
University of Ghana - UG: wins 1/7 categories
Macquarie University: wins 1/7 categories
University of Education, Winneba: wins 0/7 categories
Higher Institute Of Applied Science And Technology Of Sousse - ISSATSO: wins 3/7 categories
Perez University College - PUC: wins 0/7 categories
dBs Institute of Sound and Digital Technologies - Deep Blue Sound: wins 1/7 categories
University of the Potomac - UOTP: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Sydney, Australia
4.10
Read more reviews
29 reviews
×
Best programme: Media and Communication
Best programme: Educational Sciences
Best programme: Software Engineering
Best programme: Music Production and Sound Engineering
Washington, D.C., United States
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Data Analytics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.12
3.74
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Location
4.32
4.19
4.03
4.50
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Professors
4.25
4.31
Win
4.05
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Internationality
4.08
Win
3.97
3.72
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Student life
4.29
3.78
4.01
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Value
4.22
3.97
4.10
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.48
3.48
3.68
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
  • +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
  • +High-quality facilities and learning environments
  • +Engaging and well-taught courses
  • +Supportive and accommodating academic staff
  • +Strong education focus and qualified, supportive lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment and intellectual growth
  • +Structured fee payments
  • +Academic excellence and exam success
  • +Vibrant student life and new connections
  • +Engaging club activities

Nothing to show

  • +Great facilities, staff, and location
  • +Supportive and challenging course
  • +Strong sense of community and friendships
  • +Quality, affordable education
  • +Flexible schedules and hybrid options
  • +Relevant master's programs
Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
  • -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including delayed results and enrollment difficulties.
  • -Poor communication and unhelpful or rude staff interactions, particularly in IT.
  • -The student portal is difficult to use and slow.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology.
  • -Administrative and management issues.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty are common complaints.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring complaint.
  • -There are concerns about insufficient resources and support.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.

Overall, this university garners positive feedback, with its **Professors** receiving the highest marks. The **Facilities** and **Location** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in student housing. **Student Life** also received a moderate rating.

This institution receives its highest marks for **Value**, closely followed by **Professors** and **Location**. Student life also scores well, demonstrating a positive overall experience. Areas for potential improvement include **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest ratings. Internationality falls within the mid-range of scores.

This institution scores highly in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for Student Life and a strong 4.5 for both Location and Value. Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Internationality are also well-regarded, all receiving a solid 4. The weakest, though still positive, area is represented by the Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Internationality ratings.

Nothing to show

Excellent facilities are a significant strength, alongside strong scores for professors, location, internationality, and value. Student life offers a solid, though not outstanding, experience. The university's weakest area by a considerable margin is accommodation, which received no rating. This suggests a need for improvement in on-campus housing.

This institution receives high marks for its exceptional location and excellent facilities, both scoring 5 and 4.5 respectively. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded at 4. However, accommodation presents a significant area for improvement, with a rating of only 2.5. Professors and overall value also performed well, achieving solid scores of 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.

Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising facilities, teaching quality, and helpful staff. A small percentage (~6.9%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with administrative processes and staff interactions.

With an average rating of 4.24/5 from 82 reviews, ~91% are positive. Students praise rigorous academic programs, qualified lecturers, and a supportive learning environment. A small ~1% of feedback mentions issues with the student portal.

With an average rating of 3.5/5 and ~50% positive feedback, students praise academics and student life, including meeting new people and engaging in clubs. No negative reviews were provided.

Nothing to show

With one review and an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise the studios, staff, and facilities, highlighting the brilliant location and a challenging yet supportive course.

With an average rating of 4/5, the university is highly recommended for its quality and affordable education, offering flexible and hybrid class sessions. Negative feedback is minimal, representing approximately 0% of all reviews.

Rating distribution
5★
41%
41%
35%
0%
0%
0%
50%
4★
47%
41%
56%
50%
0%
100%
0%
3★
11%
10%
7%
50%
0%
0%
50%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
7%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Educative

The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.

A flexible path of study

I am happy with my choice of Macquarie University for my Bachelor's degree. My major in screen production has allowed me to explore practically every element of filmmaking possible. If you were looking to focus on very specific areas of study, I would perhaps look elsewhere. But for someone who has an interest in the field and isn't sure what they want to do, I have found the university opens your eyes to a world of possibilities. The campus is beautiful and easily accessible and makes an effort to create a sense of community.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

University of the Potomac, falls church Virgina

my experience at UOTP has been positive, the smaller sizes foster a more personalized learning environment allowing closer interaction with the professors and classmates. The curriculum is practical and focused on real-world applications.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close