Université Lumière Lyon 2 - L2 vs emlyon business school vs ESDES School of Management vs IGS – RH Institut de Gestion Sociale vs Ecole de Management IFAG
Side-by-side comparison from 62 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality teaching and internationally recognized educators
- +Accessible campus locations and good public transport
- +Opportunities for idea exchange and interactive learning
- +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
- +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
- +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program support.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university exhibits a varied performance across key aspects. Its strongest areas are **Student Life (4.3)** and **Location (4.18)**, indicating a vibrant campus experience and desirable setting. Conversely, **Accomodation (2.58)** and **Facilities (2.9)** received the lowest scores, suggesting potential room for improvement in these practical resources. Other categories like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a moderate to good range.
Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 3.67 average rating, approximately 50% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful teachers and interactive classes. Some reviews mention administrative and management inefficiency, with a desire for improved CROUS catering.
The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show