Hasselt University - UHasselt vs Thomas More University of Applied Sciences vs UCLL University of Applied Sciences vs University of Mons - UMONS vs Artevelde University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 200 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Well-organized onboarding and supportive staff
- +Approachable professors and engaging academic environment
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse international community
- +Expert and passionate faculty sharing real-world experience
- +Welcoming international community and global learning opportunities
- +Responsive administration and accessible, supportive staff
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Supportive and welcoming staff and sense of community
- +Practical learning and personal growth opportunities
- +Dedicated professors and supportive guidance
- +Well-structured curriculum and modern facilities
- +Welcoming international environment and vibrant student life
- +Supportive and approachable staff and coaches
- +Practical, practice-oriented teaching methodology
- +Welcoming atmosphere and opportunities to connect with peers
- +Hands-on practical learning
- +Industry-relevant skills and job preparation
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Practical, real-world business experience and skill development.
- +Unique global mobility and diverse cultural immersion opportunities.
- +Valuable industry connections and strong peer networking.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of resources and support impacts student success.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep detract from learning.
- -Lack of support and communication from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of communication and unclear administrative processes.
- -Limited academic support and outdated curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of engagement and ineffective teaching methods are common complaints.
- -Negative staff and teacher attitudes created a disrespectful and unsupportive learning environment.
- -Communication and administrative issues were a persistent source of frustration.
- -Some facilities and technological resources were outdated and insufficient.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear or lacking.
With a strong emphasis on academics and campus environment, this university garners excellent marks in key areas. Professors are highly rated at 4.7, closely followed by facilities at 4.53 and value at 4.55. Student life, while still good at 4.15, represents the area with the lowest score. Accommodation also receives slightly lower, though still positive, feedback at 4.05.
This institution received very positive evaluations. The university's **Internationality** stands out as its strongest asset, earning the highest rating. In contrast, **Accomodation** received the lowest score, though it still remains a respectable rating. Other areas like Location, Value, and Professors also received strong marks, contributing to an overall favorable impression.
This university is highly rated for its **Facilities** (4.54) and **Internationality** (4.59). **Value** (4.38) and **Student Life** (4.23) also received positive scores, along with **Accomodation** (4.24) and **Professors** (4.23). The **Location** (3.84) is the area with the lowest rating.
This institution demonstrates a solid performance across key areas. Its strongest aspects lie in **Facilities** and **Professors**, both earning a commendable 4 out of 5. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accommodation**, which received the lowest scores of 3.2. **Student Life** and **Value** are rated moderately at 3.6, while **Internationality** stands out with a strong 3.8.
An overview of the university's ratings indicates strengths in its **Location**, scoring the highest at 4.44, closely followed by **Professors** (4.21) and **Internationality** (4.24). **Student Life** also received a solid 4.2. The areas with the lowest scores are **Accomodation** at 3.68 and **Facilities** at 3.92. **Value** sits comfortably in the mid-range at 4.05.
An excellent overall assessment is evident, with the university excelling particularly in **Value** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. **Location** also garners a strong score. The **Student Life** category, while still positive, shows a slightly lower rating compared to other aspects.
This institution demonstrates a consistently strong performance across key areas. It excels particularly in **Internationality**, **Student Life**, and **Location**, all receiving top marks. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accomodation** also score highly. The **Value** proposition is well-regarded. While all ratings are impressive, the slight difference in scores suggests that the unique global atmosphere, vibrant campus experience, and convenient setting are standout features.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.65/5, reviews highlight approachable professors and a welcoming atmosphere. Students appreciate the well-structured onboarding and enriching diversity.
With a 4.41/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent preparation for the workforce, accessible and responsive administration and teachers, and enriching international experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a 4.44 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight the international environment, supportive staff, and practical learning. No negative feedback was recorded.
With 100% positive feedback, students praise high-quality education, modern facilities, and a supportive environment. Recurring themes include dedicated professors, excellent student support, and vibrant campus life, particularly for international students.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~87% of feedback being highly favorable. Students appreciate practical teaching, dedicated staff, and personal support. No negative reviews were recorded.
With an average rating of 4.46, approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting hands-on learning, practical skills for industry, and approachable teachers. One negative review mentioned disrespectful staff attitudes.
Most student reviews are highly positive, with ~83% rating 4-5 stars and an average of 4.5/5. Recurring themes include brilliant concepts, learning by doing, and valuable real-world business experience. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Wide range of knowledge acquired and even though this comes at the price of a heavy workload, I'd say it's worth it. The professors are very approachable and it is generally a health learning environment. For international students, the tuition is an absolute steal, given the quality of education.
Overall, I had a very good experience at the university. There were plenty of friendly and approachable students and teachers, which made for a welcoming environment. I studied the Data Science and Security program, which, at least during my time there, was considerably more programming-focused than I initially expected. This was something to keep in mind when choosing the program. I had some particularly great teachers, especially Collin and Elke. They made my experience much more seamless and valuable through their support and teaching. One area that could have been improved was the scheduling of certain classes, particularly in security. Some sessions were extremely long, which made it difficult to maintain energy and attention throughout the entire class. Since graduating, the campus has also undergone major renovations, and from what I’ve seen, it looks great now. Overall, I look back on my time there positively and feel that the experience provided me with a solid foundation.
As someone who is about to graduate I look back on my time at UCLL and feel very grateful! The studies challenge us in different ways, the professors are known for their impressive careers before they started lecturing and the international experience is eye-opening. I would recommend the international business management and marketing course if you're open to meet new people and grow in more ways that just learning about business.
University of Mons is one of the big universities in Belgium. We have more guidance than the other universities. The study program is adapted to each student. The student life is interested because there are many campuses in Mons.
I like how you can directly talk to teachers without feeling like there's this hierarchy. I dislike how unorganised things can be such as: poor communication, poor planning: last minute timing etc.... Having a decent study track coach really helps with everything, because this is the individual that knows a lot about your study progress and who you are normally the most in contact with. Which in my case helped me a lot with all types of processes. Such as: admin work, advice on academic goals, future goals related to academia etc... The negative point for Artevelde would also be that they do not provide any parking for students. Therefore, students have to pay a hefty amount to park their car on the street(s) near campus. Meanwhile other universities/hogeschool in Ghent do provide plenty of this. I'd call it absolute greed because they are more than able to provide, instead they like to hoard the parking spaces. For the language courses, there should be more options than the ones they offer, because the major I'm in (international organisation and management) is full of international students and not everyone wants to study: French, Dutch, Spanish or German.... there should be more options... The other issue in my opinion would be that Artevelde is a "Applied Sciences school" which means, if you want to obtain a master degree afterwards, you can't just directly study one, when you're in Belgium or most of the neighbouring countries, you'd have to do a bridging year (a prep year).
Following the Advanced bachelor of bioinformatics in Howest Hogeschool, I have to say that is a really well structured program that targets to bridge the gap between theory and working environment and give you the necessary supplies to build up your future ! Professors are are really approachable and willing to help you.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
