Bocconi University vs INSEEC Business School vs LUISS Guido Carli vs London School of Design & Marketing - LSDM vs European School of Economics - ESE
Side-by-side comparison from 188 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong marketing & business programmes with specialized, updated courses.
- +Excellent, qualified instructors with industry links and hands-on learning.
- +Excellent professional opportunities and supportive, efficient university structure.
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +Rigorous academics and top professors
- +Real-world application and practical skills
- +Personal and professional development
- +Engaging and effective learning platforms
- +Up-to-date and high-quality course content
- +Practical application through simulators
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- +Helpful tutors and support staff
- +Worthwhile and fun learning experience
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent and frustrating.
- -The educational approach emphasizes rote memorization and lacks practical application.
- -Facilities are limited and outdated, with poor course materials and inflexible schedules.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Inadequate teaching style and lack of professor accessibility.
- -Poor student support and excessive academic pressure.
- -Language barriers and incompetent staff hinder understanding.
- -Administrative & management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and guidance leaves students feeling unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create a difficult learning environment.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or not current with industry standards.
Nothing to show
This university generally receives positive feedback from students. Its strongest areas are Value and Location, both scoring over 4.3. Student Life and Facilities are also well-regarded. However, Accomodation and Internationality are the lowest-rated categories, falling below 4.0.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
This institution garners exceptional marks in its facilities, achieving a score of 4.54. Professors and internationality are also highly rated, both at 4.36, closely followed by location (4.33) and value (4.29). Student life is also a positive aspect, rated at 4.19. The lowest rated area is accommodation, with a score of 3.65.
Exceptional internationality marks this institution's highest score. Professors also receive strong commendation, indicating a positive academic experience. Conversely, the university significantly underperforms in facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, suggesting these areas require substantial improvement. Value for money is rated positively, reflecting a good return for students despite the noted weaknesses.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
This institution garners excellent scores for its location and a strong showing in professor quality and international student experience. However, areas such as facilities, student life, and accommodation received more moderate ratings, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects. Overall, it presents a compelling offering, particularly for those prioritizing geographical advantages and academic instruction.
Nothing to show
Nearly all (~96%) reviews are positive, highlighting excellent courses, qualified instructors, and professional opportunities. A small percentage (~4%) of negative feedback mentions administrative issues and outdated teaching methods.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
Nearly 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense, deep courses, real-world challenges, and personal growth. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions an unengaging teaching style and limited student assistance for academic matters.
The single review highlights a simple, effective learning platform with up-to-date, high-quality marketing content. Students appreciate the marketing simulator for practical application, resulting in a strong 4/5 average rating.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
The single review is positive, rating the university a 4/5. This feedback highlights worthwhile and fun experiences, with progress attributed to helpful tutors and support staff. Negative feedback is negligible.
Nothing to show
I love the quality of education I received at Bocconi. Having previously studied Management back in Turkey, coming here to do my masters in Marketing Management allowed me to get much more specialisation regarding my field. I got to know more about the data side of marketing, which brought me a whole other perspective. The school itself has many opportunities to make your university life the best possible experience. I enjoyed the seminars held, the extracurricular activities carried out, the opportunities to join an association, and have also been staying in one of the residences of Bocconi, which has made my life so much easier. Overall, I can say that both in terms of the education I got and the campus life Bocconi provided me, I am very satisfied with everything.
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
One of the aspects that I really appreciate at Luiss Digital program is the research focus approach. This is really equipping. The live sessions are very interesting as they also help develop public speaking. As a matter of fact, I got a research part-time job with no research skills but thanks to the research methodology courses at LUISS, I was able to pick up pace with the job.
Nothing to show
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
