INSA Rouen Normandie vs Graduate School of Engineering - ESIGELEC vs University Of Rouen vs SKEMA Business School vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 200 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Excellent training, generalist and varied approach
- +Supportive and competent international teachers with practical courses
- +Diverse and inclusive environment, strong social and associative life
- +Strong teacher-student relationships and valuable learning experiences
- +Welcoming and diverse campus community with opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Engaging academic content and extensive campus activities
- +Industry relevance and practical skills
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Career opportunities and personal development
- +Strong marketing & business programs
- +Excellent student support & community
- +Diverse academic pathways & practical experience
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
- -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
- -Unprepared and unhelpful professors with poor communication.
- -Irrelevant and outdated courses with a lack of student engagement.
- -Significant administrative and organizational issues.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong marks in several key areas. Its location is particularly well-regarded, alongside solid ratings for professors and overall value. Student life and facilities also receive favorable assessments. The university's internationality is its lowest-rated aspect, though still within a generally positive range.
This institution receives exceptionally strong marks for its Professors and Student Life, both earning a near-perfect 4.8. Value for money also scores very highly at 4.8. The weakest area, though still solid, is Facilities at 4.0. Other areas like Location, Accomodation, and Internationality are well-regarded, with ratings between 4.2 and 4.4.
Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.
This institution presents a mixed picture in its evaluations. It shines brightest in **Location**, achieving a score of over 4.1, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.07 and **Professors** at 3.9. Conversely, **Accomodation** is its least favored aspect, with a rating of 3.37. The university also garners solid marks in Internationality and Value.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university receives highly positive feedback (~100% of reviews are 4-5 stars), with an average rating of 4.6/5. Recurring praise highlights excellent training, supportive teachers, and a diverse, adaptable environment. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
All 6 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent teachers and a valuable learning experience, with a friendly and diverse campus environment. Some mention issues with building condition and communication.
~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With ~87% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.93/5, students praise good knowledge transfer, specialization options, internship access, and vibrant campus life. A small portion of reviews mention unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
