Bentley University vs University of Essex vs University of Maryland University College - UMUC vs Federal University of Technology Akure

Side-by-side comparison from 159 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bentley University (4.40)
Bentley University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Essex: wins 0/7 categories
University of Maryland University College - UMUC: wins 6/7 categories
Federal University of Technology Akure: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
29 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Colchester, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
67 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Management
Best programme: Business with Human Resources
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.31
4.75
Win
3.74
Location
3.30
3.87
4.50
Win
4.21
Professors
4.17
4.16
4.50
Win
4.26
Internationality
3.62
4.30
4.60
Win
3.72
Student life
3.86
4.10
4.75
Win
3.84
Value
4.31
4.17
4.30
4.33
Win
Accommodation
4.14
3.87
4.44
Win
3.88
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Rigorous academics and excellent faculty
  • +Career preparation and professional connections
  • +Personal development and supportive environment
  • +Supportive and approachable lecturers
  • +Engaging and well-structured courses
  • +Welcoming and inclusive environment
  • +Strong academic programs and career preparation
  • +Excellent faculty and industry-relevant curriculum
  • +Positive social connections and campus environment
  • +Strong academic programs and technical expertise development
  • +Focus on self-reliance, discipline, and practical learning
  • +Vibrant campus life and collaborative peer environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum or teaching methods are often seen as ineffective or irrelevant.
  • -Inadequate faculty support and unfair feedback.
  • -Poor transport links and remote location.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant delays and confusion.
  • -Lack of clear and consistent communication leads to misinformation.
  • -Inconsistent policies and unfair grading practices are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently mentioned.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -There are consistent criticisms regarding course content and teaching quality.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Facilities**, earning a high rating of 4.5. **Value** also stands out at 4.31. Conversely, **Location** is identified as a weaker area, with a rating of 3.3. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, Accomodation, and Internationality fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally positive student experience with some room for improvement in specific domains.

This institution excels with impressive scores in its facilities and internationality, both exceeding 4.25. Student life and value also received strong ratings above 4.0. Performance in location and accommodation, while still solid, showed a slight dip, falling just below 4.0. Professors' ratings remained commendably high.

This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.75. **Location** and **Professors** also rank highly at 4.5. While **Accommodations** at 4.44 are strong, **Value** emerges as the comparatively weakest area, though still rated well at 4.3. The university also demonstrates a good level of **Internationality** with a 4.6 rating.

Academic and financial aspects of this institution are particularly well-regarded. Value stands out with the highest rating, closely followed by professors and location. Student life and accommodation also score favorably. Facilities represent the area with the lowest score, though still within a generally positive range. Internationality is also rated moderately.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.41/5. Students praise challenging academics, excellent faculty, and supportive learning environments. Vibrant campus culture and career preparation also receive high marks.

With a 4.25/5 average rating from 67 reviews, ~98.5% of students report a positive experience. They praise knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, engaging courses, and modern facilities, with minimal criticism focused on teaching quality and assignment clarity.

With an average rating of 3.9/5, ~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic success, career preparation, and strong faculty engagement. Negative feedback (~20%) points to administrative and grading inconsistencies.

Approximately 96% of 53 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight strong academic programs, dedicated faculty, practical learning opportunities, and vibrant campus life. A minor point of concern was occasional resource inadequacy.

Rating distribution
5★
45%
37%
50%
43%
4★
52%
54%
30%
38%
3★
3%
7%
0%
19%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
1%
20%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The best Federal University of Technology in Nigeria.

The Federal University of Technology, Akure (FUTA) is the best Federal University of Technology in Nigeria. Her stable academic calendar, dedicated staffs and technology advancement made her stood out among the other Federal University of Technology. The school motto is "Technology for Self Reliance" and you can rest assured that you are going places after passing through the school.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close