Universitat de Barcelona - UB vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs BAU Centro Universitario de Artes y Diseño de Barcelona vs UIC Barcelona vs Universitat Oberta de Catalunya - UOC
Side-by-side comparison from 233 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging professors and supportive faculty
- +Vibrant international and diverse student environment
- +Stimulating academic programs and practical learning focus
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +Industry-expert professors and practical, real-world projects
- +Diverse, multicultural student environment promoting collaboration
- +Comprehensive and complete programs covering various creative skills
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Flexible online learning and self-paced study
- +High-quality teaching materials and organized virtual platform
- +Accessible and supportive professors and tutors
- +Friendly environment and well-prepared teachers
- +Engaging and interesting classes
- +Good canteen facilities
- +Supportive & engaged professors, humanistic & diverse environment
- +Practical learning, real-world application, and engaging classes
- +Accessible (affordable, online, evening classes) and helpful support
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources, including broken furniture and unreliable technology.
- -Traditional teaching methods lack engagement and personalization, with an emphasis on memorization.
- -Limited campus integration and insufficient digital support hinder student connection and flexibility.
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause significant problems.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful customer service frustrates students.
- -Poorly organized and user-unfriendly online platforms hinder access to information.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently cited as disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings across most aspects. Student Life and Professors emerge as the highest-scoring areas, both receiving an average of 4.11. Value also scores highly at 4.11. The weakest area, however, is Accommodations, which receives the lowest rating at 3.79. Facilities and Location are rated moderately well, falling between 3.88 and 3.90.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
This institution garners exceptional scores across multiple key aspects, including its facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value, all receiving a perfect 5. Conversely, the accommodation received a significantly lower rating of 1, indicating a considerable area for improvement.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
A well-rounded university experience is indicated by these ratings. The strongest aspects are the **Location** (3.89) and **Internationality/Value** (both 3.79), suggesting a desirable and globally recognized institution with good perceived worth. **Student Life** (2.67) received the lowest score, pointing to an area that could be improved. Other areas like Professors, Facilities, and Accomodation fall in the mid-range.
With outstanding scores in Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value, this institution excels in core academic and experiential offerings. Areas for potential improvement include Location and Student Life, both receiving moderate ratings. Accommodation is also viewed positively, though not reaching the top tier. Overall, the university presents a strong case, particularly for those prioritizing academic quality and global engagement.
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, and internationality. Its value proposition is also very strong. However, accommodation presents the most significant weakness, rated considerably lower. Facilities also received a middling score.
Positive feedback (~96%) highlights strong academics, knowledgeable professors, and a vibrant international environment. A small minority (~4%) mentions issues with aging facilities, disconnected campus culture, and outdated teaching methods.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
All 3 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the strong creative foundations, practical projects, and industry-expert professors. The multicultural environment and diverse course offerings were also highlighted.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting a robust virtual campus, flexible online model, and continuous assessment. A small percentage (~10%) of negative feedback mentions administrative errors and poor customer service.
With a 5/5 average rating from a single review, this university is overwhelmingly praised. The student highlighted a friendly environment, well-prepared English-speaking teachers with interesting classes, and a good canteen offering breakfast, lunch, and even beer.
All reviews are positive, highlighting helpful professors, a humanistic and diverse approach, and a practical, affordable learning experience. The average rating is 4.67 out of 5.
Honestly, I didn't attend class that often, so my connection to the university was more practical than emotional. I appreciated the resources, but I felt disconnected from campus culture. In hindsight, I'd have engaged more, but I also believe that university should facilitate more digital resources and support for those who, for whatever reason, can't always attend in person.
Nothing to show
A master of immersive and comprehensive quality focused on people with little or no design knowledge. I had an excellent experience, the only thing that perhaps did not convince me was that the final work is done as a group.
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
I started the UOC because I was very interested in Law, however I was already doing a career in a university in person. This undoubtedly, and after two years in it, it is no longer a problem. The UOC gives you the possibility to manage your time to your liking, the material is good (although it could be better and keep updating), and the jobs do not require a giant effort (it depends a lot on the subject). I definitely recommend it if you want to learn at your own pace.
In my opinion the school has a friendly environment and staff. I have classes in English and I find the teachers well prepared and have interesting classes. It has a good cantine with breakfast and lunch, you can even buy beer as well.
Nothing to show
