University of Münster - WWU vs Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences - HSRW vs IU International University of Applied Sciences vs TU Dresden vs Dresden University of Applied Sciences - HTW Dresden
Side-by-side comparison from 187 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible program options and interdisciplinary work
- +Helpful and accessible professors
- +Good organization and administrative support
- +Diverse and international student body
- +English-taught programs
- +Well-structured curriculum and learning environment
- +Flexible online study for work-life balance
- +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
- +Relevant, high-quality educational content
- +Excellent academic programs and intellectual challenge
- +Strong practical application and hands-on learning
- +Supportive environment and vibrant campus life
- +Excellent location and transport
- +Supportive professors and staff
- +Practical and industry-focused learning
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Engaging learning environment with interactive methods
- +Diverse and international student community
- +Unique multi-city European study experience
- -The education is too theoretical and outdated, lacking practical real-world application.
- -Focus on superficial academic aspects over practical relevance in thesis work.
- -Lack of thesis support and professor availability.
- -Administrative and management issues cause delays.
- -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
- -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
- -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
- -Overloaded modules and excessive study hours detract from learning time.
- -Poor translation of lecture materials hinders understanding.
- -Inconsistent teaching with multiple professors per module creates confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Communication breakdowns and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a concern.
- -Lack of transparency and communication is prevalent.
This institution shows a well-rounded performance across various aspects. Its strongest area is **Location**, receiving the highest rating. **Accomodation** presents the weakest point, with a notably lower score compared to other categories. Other aspects like Student Life and Internationality are rated favorably, while Facilities, Professors, and Value fall within a similar, moderate range.
This institution exhibits a notable strength in **Internationality**, achieving a perfect score of 4. Conversely, its **Facilities** score of 3.625, while good, represents its weakest area among the surveyed categories. Other aspects such as Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value are all rated consistently at 3.375, indicating a generally even performance across these important university metrics.
This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.
Considering various aspects of the university experience, the location stands out with an exceptional rating. Facilities and value also received high marks, indicating strengths in these areas. Student life and accommodation were rated similarly positive. While professors and internationality were rated slightly lower, they still represent solid performance. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with particular excellence in its surroundings and practical resources.
A comprehensive review reveals a generally strong performance across various university aspects. The location stands out as the highest-rated area, indicating a particularly advantageous setting. While most categories, including facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and value, received excellent scores, internationality emerged as the comparatively weakest, though still a respectable 4. This suggests a positive overall experience with room for growth in global engagement.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
This university garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its **professors and location**, both achieving perfect scores. Student life and internationality also stand out with scores above 4.7. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **facilities and accommodation**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded positive student experience with high marks across most aspects.
~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting good professors and program flexibility. A small percentage (~10%) express concerns about outdated or overly theoretical course content. The average rating is 4.1/5.
With an average rating of 3.83/5, approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a diverse, multicultural, and well-structured learning environment with English-taught programs. One review mentioned challenges with thesis support.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 12 reviews, ~75% are positive, highlighting excellent programs, engaging learning, and good facilities. A small ~8% of feedback was negative, citing demanding workloads and translation issues.
All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students highlight good location, helpful staff, and practical, industry-focused education. Dining facilities and class sizes are also praised.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
Students highly praise the interactive learning, international community, and opportunities for academic and personal growth. There are no negative reviews.
Studied in WWU Münster in IS. The education is far from a practical field, the courses are too theoretical and far from a real business perspective. Most of the lectures are outdated and boring. Professors and Ph.ds stress mostly about how do you write the exposé, which synonyms do you use but don't give any clue about how your thesis can be applied in the real world. So, be prepared for constant iterations of changing your master thesis with different wording. If you want to finish your studies in 2 years, prepare yourself for studying only. In my humble opinion, the university is over ranked and it's too conservative. Won't recommend to internationals or germans with head on their shoulders. Also, if you want to get your degree, prepare to wait for almost 2 months. The university is so "progressive", that they will provide you a piece of paper within 2 months, not earlier (already advise them to use docusign or similar software, but they are too lazy and lame).... If you want to get a student wohnheim room - prepare to spend a lot of time in "Studierendenwerk", where they don't want to give good apartments/rooms in the first meet. They even won't speak English with you.
overall good experience. could be better in terms of student technical team activities and support. Kleve is very small and is not ideal for a student life. overall good experience. could be better in terms of student technical team activities and support. Kleve is very small and is not ideal for a student life.
My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
