University of Ljubljana vs University of Primorska vs School of Communication and Media Studies - ESCS vs DOBA Business School vs University of Maribor

Side-by-side comparison from 68 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Ljubljana: wins 0/3 categories
University of Primorska: wins 0/3 categories
School of Communication and Media Studies - ESCS: wins 0/3 categories
DOBA Business School: wins 0/3 categories
University of Maribor: wins 0/3 categories
IEDC-Bled School of Management: wins 0/3 categories
Institut Supérieur des Professions Infirmières et des Techniques de Santé Agadir - ISPITS: wins 3/3 categories
Comparing
Ljubljana, Slovenia
4.20
Read more reviews
50 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Communication and Media
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Maribor, Slovenia
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Social Media
Maribor, Slovenia
4.30
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Best programme: Social Assistance and Philosophy
Category ratings
Facilities
3.89
4.00
4.13
4.00
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.57
4.50
4.29
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
3.99
3.50
4.27
4.00
4.17
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.42
4.00
3.39
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Student life
4.44
2.50
4.14
5.00
4.17
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.21
3.00
4.57
4.00
3.83
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.74
3.50
3.65
4.00
3.50
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Challenging and interdisciplinary programs
  • +Supportive and approachable professors
  • +Welcoming environment and personal development opportunities
  • +Dedicated professors and small class sizes
  • +Holistic skill development and practical learning
  • +Strong international student support and English-speaking faculty
  • +Practical, professional preparation and market recognition
  • +Autonomy and specialization options
  • +Welcoming environment and helpful staff
  • +Flexible online learning and work-life balance
  • +Ample job opportunities post-graduation
  • +Personal learning environment and professor accessibility
  • +Balance of theory and practical skills
  • +International student community and English-taught programs

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, skill-building experience and qualified instructors
  • +Well-structured program balancing theory and practice
Cons
  • -Communication and transparency issues
  • -Lack of challenging assignments and exams
  • -Limited social interaction between faculties
  • -Lack of program development and outdated course content.
  • -Overemphasis on marketing and external recognition rather than academic substance.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum issues.
  • -Administrative and management problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clarity and poor communication are prevalent concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of resources and insufficient support for learning are common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

Student feedback indicates a well-rounded university experience, with **Location** and **Student Life** receiving the highest marks. Professors also earned strong praise. Conversely, **Internationality** was rated the lowest among the surveyed aspects, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement. Other areas like Facilities, Accommodation, and Value were rated moderately well.

This institution performs exceptionally well in terms of its **location**, earning a high 4.5 rating. Its **facilities** and **internationality** are also well-regarded, both scoring 4. Students can expect a solid experience regarding **professors** and **accommodation**, with average ratings of 3.5. The university offers good **value** at 3. However, **student life** is a notable area for improvement, receiving a comparatively low score of 2.5.

This institution receives a particularly strong rating for its Value, with a score of 4.57. Other positive aspects include high marks for Location (4.29) and Professors (4.27). Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality are areas with lower scores, coming in at 3.65 and 3.39 respectively. Facilities and Student Life also received solid, though not top-tier, ratings.

This institution garners excellent marks, with top scores for its prime location, vibrant student life, and high level of internationality. Facilities, professors, and accommodation are also rated positively. The sole area receiving a slightly lower rating, though still strong, is value, suggesting areas for potential enhancement within the student experience.

Generally, this institution demonstrates strong performance in key areas. Its strongest aspects are the quality of its professors and the vibrancy of its student life, both receiving excellent scores. The university also fares well in location and internationality. However, its facilities and accommodation are areas where improvement could be considered, as they received the lowest ratings. The overall value for students is also quite good.

Nothing to show

This institution achieves near-perfect scores across most surveyed areas, excelling in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value. The sole area showing a slight dip, though still strong, is Accomodation, rated at a commendable 4. Overall, the university presents a robust and highly-rated educational experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.2/5 average rating from 50 reviews, ~94% praise academically challenging programs, interdisciplinary collaboration, and supportive professors. One review found assignments and exams unchallenging.

With an average rating of 3.67/5, most students found the university a good place to study, highlighting dedicated professors and strong faculty for technical and artistic development. A smaller portion felt the institution prioritized marketing over program improvement.

University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~86% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent practical learning, autonomy, and preparation for professional communication careers. A small portion (~14%) mentioned some redundant information.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised. The single positive review highlights flexibility for balancing study with work and good future job prospects.

With an average rating of 4.33/5 from six reviews, ~100% are positive. Students value the personal learning environment, knowledgeable and approachable lecturers, and a good balance of theory and practical skills across diverse programs.

Nothing to show

The single review is positive, with a 5/5 average rating. This reflects ~100% positive feedback, highlighting a well-structured program, qualified instructors, and beneficial clinical placements.

Rating distribution
5★
28%
33%
14%
100%
33%
0%
100%
4★
66%
33%
71%
0%
67%
0%
0%
3★
4%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great academic quality

The university offered strong academics with some of the best professors and researchers in the country. Some proffessors did take a lot of academic liberty though, but that did contribute to the overall student experience. Ljubljana is an amazing student city, very welcoming, safe and warm, but houseng opportunities can scarce.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close