Ghent University vs University of Antwerp vs Vlerick Business School vs European Wine Academy vs Hogeschool Gent - HoGent

Side-by-side comparison from 174 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Vlerick Business School (4.70)
Ghent University: wins 2/7 categories
University of Antwerp: wins 0/7 categories
Vlerick Business School: wins 5/7 categories
European Wine Academy: wins 0/7 categories
Hogeschool Gent - HoGent: wins 0/7 categories
Artevelde University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Howest University of Applied Sciences - HOWEST: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Ghent, Belgium
4.30
Read more reviews
56 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Antwerp, Belgium
4.20
Read more reviews
37 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Advanced Master in Digital Strategy Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Education
Best programme: International Business Management
Best programme: Advanced Bachelor of Bioinformatics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.31
4.26
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.33
3.90
3.92
Location
4.30
4.18
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.43
4.23
Professors
4.32
4.46
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.21
4.00
Internationality
4.32
3.97
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.67
4.23
4.54
Student life
4.32
Win
4.14
3.67
Not rated
3.67
4.19
3.73
Value
4.26
4.34
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.03
4.62
Accommodation
4.12
Win
4.09
3.33
Not rated
4.00
3.70
3.83
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High quality education and engaging professors
  • +Supportive learning environment and practical experience
  • +Vibrant student city and social life
  • +Engaging and well-structured programmes with relevant, practical content.
  • +Approachable and knowledgeable professors fostering a welcoming, collaborative atmosphere.
  • +Opportunities for networking and building a strong social and professional community.
  • +Rigorous, well-structured programs with real-world application
  • +Expert faculty deeply invested in student success
  • +Strong industry connections and career focus

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent teaching and accessible resources
  • +Practical, field-relevant learning experiences
  • +Positive and effective university system
  • +Supportive and approachable staff/lecturers
  • +Practical, hands-on learning approach
  • +Welcoming environment and activities
  • +Hands-on practical learning
  • +Industry-relevant skills and job preparation
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum gaps lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Intense academic pressure negatively impacts student mental health.
  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They express frustration with outdated facilities and resources.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of consistent and competent teaching staff.
  • -Poor administrative support and organization.
  • -Unsupportive and unprofessional interactions with staff.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
  • -Negative staff and teacher attitudes created a disrespectful and unsupportive learning environment.
  • -Communication and administrative issues were a persistent source of frustration.
  • -Some facilities and technological resources were outdated and insufficient.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners high marks in several key areas, with exceptional scores for Professors, Student Life, and Internationality all at 4.32. Facilities also score well at 4.31. Accommodation and Value are also strong, reflecting a generally positive student experience. The weakest area is Location, which received a lower rating.

This institution receives favorable marks across multiple aspects. Its professors are particularly well-regarded, standing out as its strongest area. While accommodation and internationality also received solid scores, internationality is rated slightly lower compared to other surveyed categories. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with key strengths in academic instruction.

Boasting exceptional scores, the institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving perfect 5/5 ratings. **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also demonstrate strong performance with scores above 4.6. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest ratings at 3.67 and 3.33 respectively. Overall, the university presents a solid offering, particularly in its physical environment and academic/global engagement.

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks in several key areas, notably Professors, Location, Accomodation, and Value, all scoring a solid 4 out of 5. Student Life and Internationality also perform well, averaging approximately 3.67. The weakest area appears to be Facilities, which received a rating of 3.33, indicating room for improvement in this category.

This university garners particularly high marks for its Location, receiving a score of 4.43. Its Internationality is also a strong suit at 4.23. Conversely, Accomodation presents an area for improvement, rated at 3.70, making it the lowest scoring aspect. Other categories such as Professors, Student Life, and Value also received favorable ratings above 4.0.

An excellent overall assessment is evident, with the university excelling particularly in **Value** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. **Location** also garners a strong score. The **Student Life** category, while still positive, shows a slightly lower rating compared to other aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 56 reviews, ~98% of feedback is positive. Students praise the high educational standards, vibrant student city, user-friendly learning platforms, and approachable, enthusiastic professors. No negative feedback was recorded.

University feedback is highly positive, with ~97% of 37 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise well-planned courses, excellent lecturers, and a welcoming, inspiring atmosphere. One review mentioned study pressure and mental health concerns.

All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the well-structured, interactive curriculum, expert faculty, and strong industry connections. Some wish for more career focus for MBA students.

Nothing to show

Two out of three reviews are positive, with praise for teachers and program structure. One review expresses dissatisfaction with teacher availability and support services.

With 54 positive reviews out of 62, students praise approachable professors, practical teaching methods, and supportive staff. Learners highlight well-organized programs and opportunities to meet peers. Approximately 0% of feedback is negative.

With an average rating of 4.46, approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting hands-on learning, practical skills for industry, and approachable teachers. One negative review mentioned disrespectful staff attitudes.

Rating distribution
5★
30%
41%
67%
0%
33%
27%
69%
4★
68%
46%
33%
0%
33%
60%
23%
3★
2%
11%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
Most useful review
Most liked
Wonderful University

Ghent University is an ideal location for students. It has excellent facilities and a picturesque campus, and it's set in a charming town. The faculty are dedicated to supporting students and making sure they understand the material. Overall, I couldn't be happier with my choice to study here. I feel lucky to be part of such a wonderful university.

Legal Technology and Responsible AI programme

I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the excellent Legal Technology and Responsible AI Programme. The programme provided a valuable opportunity to deepen my understanding of the legal, regulatory, and technological issues surrounding artificial intelligence and data governance. In particular, I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Jan Blockx for his outstanding academic leadership and engaging lectures. The course content was well-structured, insightful, and highly relevant to current developments in technology law. His ability to connect legal theory with practical challenges helped participants better understand the opportunities and risks associated with AI and emerging technologies. I would also like to express my gratitude to Prof. Toon Calders for his excellent contribution to the programme. His clear and accessible explanations of AI concepts provided an important technical perspective that complemented the legal discussions. The interdisciplinary approach greatly enhanced the overall learning experience and strengthened participants' understanding of responsible AI. In addition, I would like to thank Nele Voorspoels for her exceptional administrative support. Her prompt communication, attention to detail, and assistance with travel ensured a smooth and enjoyable experience throughout the course. Overall, the programme exceeded my expectations. The combination of high-quality teaching, excellent organization, and meaningful discussions created an inspiring learning environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Ledeganck teachers education

We didn't have a biology teacher for a full year. 4 different substitute teachers that weren't informed well by HoGent. The arts class is very educational, but the teacher is not objectieve at all. Was talking to the internship supporter, she doesn't let jou talk. Can't get a word in between. Very annoying. I don't feel like she cared to listen. She doesn't care. It's not okey! Don't expect support. There are some really sweet teachers. But overall no great support or organization.

Good base bachelor's degree (IOM)

I like how you can directly talk to teachers without feeling like there's this hierarchy. I dislike how unorganised things can be such as: poor communication, poor planning: last minute timing etc.... Having a decent study track coach really helps with everything, because this is the individual that knows a lot about your study progress and who you are normally the most in contact with. Which in my case helped me a lot with all types of processes. Such as: admin work, advice on academic goals, future goals related to academia etc... The negative point for Artevelde would also be that they do not provide any parking for students. Therefore, students have to pay a hefty amount to park their car on the street(s) near campus. Meanwhile other universities/hogeschool in Ghent do provide plenty of this. I'd call it absolute greed because they are more than able to provide, instead they like to hoard the parking spaces. For the language courses, there should be more options than the ones they offer, because the major I'm in (international organisation and management) is full of international students and not everyone wants to study: French, Dutch, Spanish or German.... there should be more options... The other issue in my opinion would be that Artevelde is a "Applied Sciences school" which means, if you want to obtain a master degree afterwards, you can't just directly study one, when you're in Belgium or most of the neighbouring countries, you'd have to do a bridging year (a prep year).

Studies investment

Following the Advanced bachelor of bioinformatics in Howest Hogeschool, I have to say that is a really well structured program that targets to bridge the gap between theory and working environment and give you the necessary supplies to build up your future ! Professors are are really approachable and willing to help you.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close