Ghent University vs Hasselt University - UHasselt vs Kask & Conservatorium School of Arts Gent - KASK vs Thomas More University of Applied Sciences vs Hogeschool Gent - HoGent
Side-by-side comparison from 179 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging professors with subject enthusiasm and approachable mentorship
- +Practical and well-organized curriculum with research opportunities
- +User-friendly learning platform and supportive academic environment
- +Challenging academics and supportive staff
- +Welcoming atmosphere and international diversity
- +Affordable tuition and rewarding learning experience
- +Supportive staff and practical assistance for students
- +Dedicated instructors offering extra help and resources
- +Opportunities for internships and organized excursions
- +Small classes and accessible, supportive lecturers
- +Practical, project-based learning with real-world application
- +Modern campus facilities and vibrant student city
- +Practical field exposure & industry professionals as instructors
- +Practical, real-world relevant programmes
- +Approachable and helpful lecturers
- +Enriching international opportunities and campus life
- +Practical, well-structured programs with real-world projects
- +Approachable faculty and strong student support systems
- +Welcoming community and diverse opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -A lack of clarity and support from instructors negatively impacts learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a major drawback.
- -The academic programs and teaching quality are often disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Unfair grading and unsupportive instructors.
- -Poor educational quality and high student attrition.
- -Lack of qualified teachers and poor communication regarding substitutes.
- -Unsupportive and unaccommodating staff, particularly in internship support.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching and lack of objectivity in some classes.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Disrespectful and unhelpful staff and teachers.
- -Poorly managed administrative processes.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its Facilities and Internationality, both scoring above 4.3. Student Life and Professors also receive very positive marks, closely following. Accomodation and Value are rated highly as well. The weakest area, though still rated above average, is Location at 3.68.
This institution generally receives positive feedback across its various aspects. The strongest areas are clearly Professors, closely followed by Location and Facilities. Student Life and Accommodation are rated comparably, representing the areas with the lowest scores among the surveyed categories, though still indicating a generally favorable reception.
This university presents a uniform evaluation across all assessed aspects, with no standout strengths or weaknesses. Every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, received a rating of zero. This suggests a consistent, albeit low, performance level across the board, indicating areas where significant improvements may be necessary in all surveyed domains.
With an impressive overall profile, this institution excels particularly in **Internationality** and **Location**, both scoring 4.5. Students also appreciate the robust **Facilities** (4.29) and engaging **Student Life** (4.24). The **Accomodation** received the lowest score (4.07), indicating an area for potential improvement, though all other categories maintain strong to excellent ratings.
The university scores highly in location, earning a notable 4.5. Accommodation also receives a positive rating of 4. Areas of solid performance include professors, student life, and internationality, all with scores of 3.5. The university's weakest area is facilities, rated at 3.
Considering the provided ratings, the university excels in **Location**, receiving a perfect 4.5. **Internationality** and **Student Life** also score highly, both above 4.2. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weaker points, with scores of approximately 3.9 and 3.8 respectively. Ratings for **Professors** and **Value** are solid, sitting at around 4.16 and 4.
This university demonstrates particular strength in its **Internationality** and **Value**, both receiving top marks. **Location** also scores highly, suggesting a desirable setting. Conversely, the areas of **Accomodation** and **Student Life** show the lowest ratings, indicating room for improvement in these aspects. Facilities and Professors received solid, mid-range scores.
With ~98% positive feedback, reviews highlight user-friendly learning platforms, approachable and enthusiastic professors, and strong research opportunities. Students appreciate well-organized curricula and mentorship. No negative reviews were recorded.
All 19 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students praise the challenging yet rewarding academics, the welcoming international atmosphere, and approachable professors. There were no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 4/5, the sole review for KASK highlights exceptional support and internship opportunities for international students. Although classes are primarily in Dutch, professors offer extra help to ensure understanding.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, reviews highlight practical, project-based learning and accessible lecturers. ~98% of feedback is positive, with just one negative review mentioning unfair grading.
With an average rating of 3/5, reviews are split evenly. Positive feedback highlights engaging guest lectures and real-world practice, while negative comments cite issues with consistent teaching staff, biased instructors, and unsupportive administrative interactions.
With 42 positive reviews out of 48, students highly praise dynamic and practical courses, helpful lecturers, and valuable real-life skills. There are no negative reviews.
With a 4.36/5 average rating from 11 reviews, ~91% are positive, highlighting a challenging yet rewarding curriculum, supportive people, and practical, career-focused education. A small ~9% of feedback mentioned issues with staff attitude and respect.
Ghent University is an ideal location for students. It has excellent facilities and a picturesque campus, and it's set in a charming town. The faculty are dedicated to supporting students and making sure they understand the material. Overall, I couldn't be happier with my choice to study here. I feel lucky to be part of such a wonderful university.
Wide range of knowledge acquired and even though this comes at the price of a heavy workload, I'd say it's worth it. The professors are very approachable and it is generally a health learning environment. For international students, the tuition is an absolute steal, given the quality of education.
KASK was my host university for my Erasmus studies. It was the first time my university sent someone for Erasmus and they helped with all posible, they provided me with a spot in the residence, and with an internship in one of the professor's architecture studio. Clases are mostly in dutch, so it's not the most suitable place for an Erasmus student, still the teacher always offered to stay after class to go throw the main points in order to make sure I would understand. They also organise trips for the students, they would even put me in contact with a local student in case I would have any doubts, so she would help me out. The building was absolutely beautiful and quite close to the center. Public transport is a close option, but the best to move around and go to the university is the bike. Will definitely go say hi next time I go back to Ghent.
I’ve just finished my degree in International Tourism & Leisure at Thomas More, and honestly, it’s been an amazing experience. The program gave me a solid understanding of the tourism and hospitality industry and helped me develop both practical and theoretical skills. What I loved most was the international approach and the hands-on projects with real companies, which really prepared me for the professional world. The professors were always supportive and passionate about what they teach, which made a huge difference. On top of that, I met incredible people from all over the world and made friends for life, which made the experience even more special. Thanks to this degree, I’ve gained not only knowledge but also great opportunities to grow and start my career in tourism. Definitely recommend it to anyone interested in this field!
We didn't have a biology teacher for a full year. 4 different substitute teachers that weren't informed well by HoGent. The arts class is very educational, but the teacher is not objectieve at all. Was talking to the internship supporter, she doesn't let jou talk. Can't get a word in between. Very annoying. I don't feel like she cared to listen. She doesn't care. It's not okey! Don't expect support. There are some really sweet teachers. But overall no great support or organization.
I like how you can directly talk to teachers without feeling like there's this hierarchy. I dislike how unorganised things can be such as: poor communication, poor planning: last minute timing etc.... Having a decent study track coach really helps with everything, because this is the individual that knows a lot about your study progress and who you are normally the most in contact with. Which in my case helped me a lot with all types of processes. Such as: admin work, advice on academic goals, future goals related to academia etc... The negative point for Artevelde would also be that they do not provide any parking for students. Therefore, students have to pay a hefty amount to park their car on the street(s) near campus. Meanwhile other universities/hogeschool in Ghent do provide plenty of this. I'd call it absolute greed because they are more than able to provide, instead they like to hoard the parking spaces. For the language courses, there should be more options than the ones they offer, because the major I'm in (international organisation and management) is full of international students and not everyone wants to study: French, Dutch, Spanish or German.... there should be more options... The other issue in my opinion would be that Artevelde is a "Applied Sciences school" which means, if you want to obtain a master degree afterwards, you can't just directly study one, when you're in Belgium or most of the neighbouring countries, you'd have to do a bridging year (a prep year).
Following the Advanced bachelor of bioinformatics in Howest Hogeschool, I have to say that is a really well structured program that targets to bridge the gap between theory and working environment and give you the necessary supplies to build up your future ! Professors are are really approachable and willing to help you.
