Romanian-American University vs Ovidius University of Constanta - UOC vs Andrei Şaguna University of Constanţa vs Spiru Haret University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS

Side-by-side comparison from 15 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Romanian-American University (4.20)
Romanian-American University: wins 4/7 categories
Ovidius University of Constanta - UOC: wins 1/7 categories
Andrei Şaguna University of Constanţa: wins 0/7 categories
Spiru Haret University: wins 2/7 categories
Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS: wins 0/7 categories
Bucharest Business School - BBS: wins 0/7 categories
Constanta Maritime University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
4.20
Top
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: American Studies
Bucharest, Romania
4.00
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.98
Win
3.38
3.60
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.82
4.40
Win
3.30
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.15
3.83
2.30
4.25
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.33
Win
3.88
3.80
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.97
Win
3.33
3.80
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.98
3.68
2.60
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.82
Win
3.23
2.30
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
  • +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
  • +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
  • +Knowledgeable & supportive faculty
  • +Comprehensive & challenging curriculum
  • +Extensive resources & facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Accessible and flexible for working students
  • +Competent and available teachers
  • +Modern facilities and engaging courses

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
  • -Disregard and lack of student value.
  • -Limited extracurricular opportunities.
  • -Corruption within the system.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

Location stands out as the university's strongest asset, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with the lowest score. Other categories like professors and internationality also performed well. Student life and facilities received moderate ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement. The overall value is considered good.

Nothing to show

This institution garners its highest marks for Professors and Location, both receiving a strong 4.25. Its Value is also notable at a perfect 4. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality present areas for potential improvement, each scoring 3.25. Facilities and Accommodations fall in the mid-range with solid 3.75 ratings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.

With an average rating of 3.75/5, ~75% of university student reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable faculty, comprehensive curriculum, and extensive resources. Approximately 25% of feedback is negative, citing poor student treatment and limited extracurricular opportunities.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from 4 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight accessible learning and available teachers. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
50%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
4★
33%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
25%
100%
25%
0%
0%
0%
2★
17%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Affordable location

Available teachers for all course issues. Location near your home town. Courses take place according to the curriculum. The classes are interactive and complex. With some of my colleagues, we still keep in touch and we are very close.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close