University of New York in Prague - UNYP vs University of Chemistry and Technology of Prague vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT vs Anglo-American University - AAU vs Palacký University Olomouc - UPOL
Side-by-side comparison from 213 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International, American-style education with small, discussion-based classes
- +Practical, real-world learning from experienced, accessible professors
- +Supportive and engaging environment that encourages critical thinking
- +Supportive faculty and program flexibility
- +Practical, hands-on learning with excellent labs and equipment
- +Strong community and international student experience
- +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
- +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
- +Caring professors and strong community support
- +Enriching international environment and connections
- +Inspiring location and career development opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and motivating education.
- +Practical curriculum with knowledgeable and helpful professors.
- +Hands-on learning opportunities and vibrant campus life.
Nothing to show
- +Strong community and supportive teachers.
- +Modern campus and facilities.
- +Abundant extracurricular activities and personal development opportunities.
- -Overpriced tuition and fees.
- -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Unresponsive administration and management.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are commonly criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Lack of effective teaching and learning resources.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and the overall experience.
- -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacts student success.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of essential resources hinders learning.
The university garners strong scores across most aspects, with **Location** standing out as exceptionally high at 4.90. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received very positive feedback. **Accomodation** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.95, while **Facilities** and **Value** are rated well but not as high as other categories. Professors and overall value are also rated favorably.
The university's location received the highest marks, with a score of 4.7, followed closely by facilities and accommodation, both at 4.27. Areas for improvement include internationality, which scored 3.82, making it the weakest surveyed category. Student life and value for money were rated at a solid 4.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.
The university garners positive feedback across several key aspects. Location stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.62. Student life and internationality also score highly, both exceeding 4.5. Conversely, accommodation receives the lowest score at 4.20, representing the weakest area. Facilities, professors, and value maintain solid ratings, all above 4.4.
This university garners strong marks across several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location** (4.6) and **Student Life** (4.4). **Accomodation** also scores highly at 4.5. However, the university's **Internationality** is a relative weakness, receiving a rating of 3.8, indicating an area for potential improvement compared to its other strong attributes.
Nothing to show
Professors stand out with an impressive rating, reflecting a particular strength in academic instruction. The university also scores highly in location and value. Accommodation presents the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement compared to other aspects of the student experience. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid, well-rounded performance.
All 50 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.68/5. Students praise the international environment, smaller classes, and professors' practical industry experience. Discussions and critical thinking are highlighted strengths.
Nine out of ten reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, skilled faculty, and practical, research-oriented programs. Some mention demanding courses and occasional English communication barriers from instructors.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.
All 66 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight a strong sense of community, supportive and knowledgeable professors, and valuable international experiences. The university's location and resources are also frequently praised.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 5 reviews, students highlight a strong positive experience. Recurring themes include a well-structured, practical curriculum, helpful professors, and a vibrant campus life, with ~0% negative feedback.
Nothing to show
With a 4.8/5 average rating from 45 reviews, students praise the strong sense of community, wonderful professors, and modern, welcoming campus. There are no reported negative experiences.
I studied at UNYP and overall had a very positive experience. What I appreciated most was the international environment, smaller classes, and the chance to interact directly with professors instead of feeling like just another student in a huge lecture hall. The university has a practical, English-speaking atmosphere, and it is a good fit for students who want an American-style education in the center of Prague. I also liked that many classes encouraged discussion, presentations, and real examples rather than only theory. Of course, like at any university, some administrative processes can take time and the experience may depend on the program and professors you choose. But from a student perspective, UNYP gave me useful academic experience, international connections, and a lot of personal growth. I would recommend it to students who want a smaller, international university environment in Prague and are ready to be active in their studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I can say I am completely different from before and after AAU. At some point I wondered but now without even noticing I can see my knowledge has improved a lot. I say seamless because it is not the traditional type of learning, you learn through hands on projects, in class discussions, real world scenarios, interactive sessions and becomes part of your day to day life and interests. I 100% Recommend AAU to anyone who wants to experience a life-long a real international community and learn in the process while having the time of your life in Europe!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Great sense of community, once you find the right people. The professors are wonderful, especially Dr. Hurtová and Dr. Tomášková. The entire university recently had a massive facelift, so the whole institution feels modern and welcoming.
