GBSB Global Business School vs ESADE Business School vs IE University vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
Side-by-side comparison from 374 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible online and on-campus study options
- +High-quality faculty and practical, well-structured curriculum
- +Supportive community and international environment
- +Diverse and international community fostering personal growth and networking.
- +Excellent professors and practical learning with real-world application opportunities.
- +Supportive environment with intense, up-to-date academics and strong career placements.
- +Engaging practical learning and networking opportunities
- +Diverse and international student community
- +Experienced professors with real-world insights
- +Supportive and accessible professors
- +Practical and theory-balanced curriculum
- +Good resources and campus environment
- +High academic rigor and quality of courses.
- +Supportive and welcoming staff.
- +Practical focus and excellent facilities.
- +Supportive and attentive faculty
- +High-quality, well-organized programs
- +Diverse and international community
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Low educational quality & irrelevant programs
- -Lack of student support & career assistance
- -Administrative and financial issues, including poor handling of refunds and lack of server capacity.
- -Lack of focus on intellectual development and critical thinking.
- -Negative peer environment and perceived bullying.
- -Outdated or irrelevant course content and misleading marketing.
- -Poor program management and inflexible attendance policies.
- -A corporate campus environment lacking traditional college experiences.
- -Poor English proficiency of professors and lack of student-teacher engagement.
- -Disorganized administrative processes and a general lack of care for international students.
- -Poor organization and unqualified staff
- -Disrespectful and uncaring faculty
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring problems.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum concerns are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
- -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
When considering university feedback, internationality stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest rating. Location and professors also score very well. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, with a significantly lower score compared to other aspects. Facilities and student life are moderately rated, while value falls in the middle.
This institution demonstrates robust performance across various metrics. Its strongest area is **Professors**, with an impressive rating of 4.38. **Value** also scores highly at 4.26, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.12 and **Internationality** at 4.09. The weakest areas are **Facilities** at 3.97 and **Accomodation** at 3.83, though these still represent solid scores.
Examining the provided university ratings, **Internationality** stands out as the strongest area with a score of 4.78. **Location** also garners significant praise at 4.55. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest point, rated at 3.90. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value all received solid ratings between 4.24 and 4.41, indicating a generally positive experience across the board.
The university demonstrates its strongest performance in **Professors**, receiving a rating of 4.18. **Facilities** also score well at 4.10. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are identified as areas for improvement, with ratings of 3.63 and 3.59 respectively. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range.
Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with **Student Life** standing out as a particular strength. Areas like **Facilities** and **Professors** also received solid ratings. Conversely, **Location** and **Internationality** are rated somewhat lower, suggesting these aspects could be areas for improvement. **Accomodation** and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores.
Reviewing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The strongest area for the institution is clearly its professors, who received an excellent rating. Students also appear to be well-served by the location and student life. Areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, scores include facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value for money.
This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility, quality professors, and community. Negative feedback, about 14.3%, points to administrative issues and perceived low educational quality.
With ~92% of reviews being positive, students highlight valuable international environments, diverse communities, and practical learning. Some negative feedback, representing ~8%, mentions concerns about program value and specific logistical issues.
~97% of reviews are positive, praising the practical, international environment and experienced professors. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions concerns with academic standards and marketing promises.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good teaching quality, practical learning, and strong support. A small fraction, around 3.9%, expressed dissatisfaction with English proficiency and program organization.
Most students are very satisfied, praising demanding coursework, quality professors, and excellent facilities. Around 11% of feedback is negative, citing poor organization and disrespect from some staff.
With a 4.18 average rating from 11 reviews, students praise UCAM's high-level teaching, supportive faculty, and enriching academic and international environments. No negative feedback was provided.
The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Esade has been a great start for my career. You have the opportunity to learn a lot from classes, but also from the people (professors and other students). They really help you to do your first steps in the world, referrings to your career
ie university is the best university in the world, they education system is the best and infrastructure. It's the best university to put your child to I'm very happy with it i dont wanna lie l. Please go for it
Nothing to show
The Faculty of Communication is clearly oriented to the journalist being the communication the second course. From here you find everything: material in poor condition, teachers who are teachers for the mere fact of being ex-students without being properly qualified, curriculum badly organized with repeated subjects and others of filling where they do not meet the teacher's guide , Impressive lack of practices or practices that have nothing to do with the sector, misleading advertising on the web (wide range of options that teachers are responsible for reducing to a minimum without consulting the interest of students claiming "I do because I think it is The best for you "), the work grants are distributed according to how well you take with x person, etc. Leaders in personal attention? I do not think so. I am aware that the situation is better than in a public but for what it costs, it is not worth at all. If you do not know what to do with your life, it can help you because you give 1000 different things and you can find your vocation, if you know what you want, choose to take your money in a smarter way.
The life in Murcia is simply great! A lot of tapas bars, bars, clubs etc. which are affordable for students! During the courses at UCAM, I got to know so many international people who got really good friends in the meanwhile. The only shortcoming is that several professors have difficulties to explain their ideas in English, because of the language barrier. But this does not concern every teacher. Furthermore, the teaching staff is not only about professors but about people having their own business and talking about their own experiences. All in all the education is pretty good at UCAM. But the working-life balance is even better. "Savoir-Vivre!"
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
