GBSB Global Business School vs ESADE Business School vs IE University vs Universidad Europea - UE vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP
Side-by-side comparison from 395 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible learning options and strong academic programs.
- +Supportive community and international atmosphere.
- +Practical, real-world application and career development support.
- +Diverse and international community fostering personal growth and networking.
- +Excellent professors and practical learning with real-world application opportunities.
- +Supportive environment with intense, up-to-date academics and strong career placements.
- +Practical application of theory and real-world projects
- +Experienced professors with industry insights
- +International environment and networking opportunities
- +Modern teaching methods and well-equipped facilities
- +Strong focus on practical learning and career opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and enriching academic environment
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +High-quality teaching and practical learning approach
- +Excellent university resources and welcoming atmosphere
- +Expert instructors with industry experience.
- +Practical academic training and entrepreneurial focus.
- +Abundant practical experiences and extracurricular activities.
- +Supportive and attentive faculty
- +High-quality, well-organized programs
- +Diverse and international community
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Low educational and academic quality
- -Poor career and internship support
- -Administrative and financial issues, including poor handling of refunds and lack of server capacity.
- -Lack of focus on intellectual development and critical thinking.
- -Negative peer environment and perceived bullying.
- -Marketing claims do not align with the actual educational experience and quality.
- -Program management and administrative processes are inefficient and inflexible.
- -The campus environment is overly corporate and lacks traditional college experiences.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful staff.
- -Lack of teacher engagement and support.
- -Financial policies and material costs.
- -Poor English proficiency of professors.
- -Lack of organization and student engagement.
- -Unsupportive environment for international students.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues.
- -Low quality of teaching and outdated curriculum.
- -High cost relative to the educational experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring problems.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum concerns are frequently mentioned.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Professors** also garnered positive feedback. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range, indicating areas with room for improvement alongside established positives.
This institution demonstrates robust performance across various metrics. Its strongest area is **Professors**, with an impressive rating of 4.38. **Value** also scores highly at 4.26, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.12 and **Internationality** at 4.09. The weakest areas are **Facilities** at 3.97 and **Accomodation** at 3.83, though these still represent solid scores.
Internationality stands out as the university's strongest suit, boasting an impressive rating. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other categories like location, student life, and professors also scored well, demonstrating a generally positive overall profile.
This university garners high marks for its internationality, achieving a rating of 4.49. Professors are also well-regarded at 4.21, closely followed by facilities at 4.23 and student life at 4.04. Conversely, accommodation and value received lower scores, at 3.79 and 3.72 respectively, while location sits at 3.98.
Overall, the university garners favorable assessments in multiple aspects. Strengths lie in its professors, who received the highest rating, closely followed by facilities. Areas for improvement include accommodation and internationality, which received the lowest scores. Student life and location also scored reasonably well, while value sits in the middle range of ratings.
Assessing the university's performance, facilities stand out as the strongest area, achieving a score of 4. In contrast, location and student life received the lowest ratings, both at 2.25. Professors and accommodation were rated moderately well at 3.25. Internationality scored a 3, while value for money was rated at 2.5, indicating areas for potential improvement in these aspects.
Reviewing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The strongest area for the institution is clearly its professors, who received an excellent rating. Students also appear to be well-served by the location and student life. Areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, scores include facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value for money.
~74% of 48 reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility, excellent professors, and community. A smaller ~12.5% of reviews express dissatisfaction with the program's value, administrative support, and academic standards.
With ~92% of reviews being positive, students highlight valuable international environments, diverse communities, and practical learning. Some negative feedback, representing ~8%, mentions concerns about program value and specific logistical issues.
The university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback (~85%), with students highlighting practical projects, experienced professors, and an international environment. A small percentage (~3%) cite issues like academic standards and misleading marketing.
Most reviews are positive (~96%), highlighting modern teaching methods, practical learning, and job opportunities. A small minority of feedback (~4%) mentions indifferent teachers and material costs.
~74% of 49 reviews are positive, praising friendly, supportive staff, good teaching, and facilities. Only ~4% of feedback is negative, citing low English proficiency from professors and lack of organization.
With a 3/5 average rating, reviews suggest positive experiences (~60%) with high-quality teaching and practical training. However, negative feedback (~40%) points to disorganization and declining teacher quality.
With a 4.18 average rating from 11 reviews, students praise UCAM's high-level teaching, supportive faculty, and enriching academic and international environments. No negative feedback was provided.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Esade has been a great start for my career. You have the opportunity to learn a lot from classes, but also from the people (professors and other students). They really help you to do your first steps in the world, referrings to your career
ie university is the best university in the world, they education system is the best and infrastructure. It's the best university to put your child to I'm very happy with it i dont wanna lie l. Please go for it
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The life in Murcia is simply great! A lot of tapas bars, bars, clubs etc. which are affordable for students! During the courses at UCAM, I got to know so many international people who got really good friends in the meanwhile. The only shortcoming is that several professors have difficulties to explain their ideas in English, because of the language barrier. But this does not concern every teacher. Furthermore, the teaching staff is not only about professors but about people having their own business and talking about their own experiences. All in all the education is pretty good at UCAM. But the working-life balance is even better. "Savoir-Vivre!"
