Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne vs SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs The International Film and Television School of Paris - EICAR vs Paris College of Art
Side-by-side comparison from 233 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality courses and inspiring professors
- +Stimulating academic and multicultural environment
- +Excellent location with cultural access
- +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
- +International experience and career support
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Project-based learning and practical application.
- +Networking opportunities with diverse individuals.
- +Professional workshops and industry engagement.
- +Supportive and expert faculty, fostering collaboration and personalized guidance.
- +Innovative programs with a blend of creative freedom and practical application.
- +Diverse international student body and rich learning environment.
- +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
- +Practical experience and career advancement support
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and a lack of transparency create uncertainty and dissatisfaction.
- -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
- -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
- -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Frequent and unannounced administrative changes cause confusion.
- -Facilities are consistently described as old and poorly maintained.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
- -Outdated and inadequate facilities, including issues with heating and cleanliness.
- -Poor quality of teaching and lack of practical skills development.
- -Concerns about administrative issues and the overall value for money.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
- -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates considerable strengths in its academic offerings and international appeal, with professors earning a notable 4.59 and internationality rated at 4.22. Facilities also received a positive 4.0 rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a 3.06, and student life at 3.69, indicating these aspects are less highly regarded compared to the university's other evaluated features.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
This institution excels in several key aspects, achieving top marks for its **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all rated a perfect 5. Professors also receive high commendation with a score of 4. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of only 2. Facilities are rated moderately at 3, and the overall **Value** is considered good at 4.
This institution exhibits a mixed performance across its assessed areas. Its strongest point is **Internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4.29. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the weakest area, scoring a low 2.0. Other areas like Location and Professors also received moderate to good scores, while Student Life, Accomodation, and Value fell in the lower to mid-range.
Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.
Nothing to show
With 32 positive reviews and 0 negative, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise high-quality courses and professors, a stimulating academic environment, and the university's prime Paris location. Some mention challenging scientific subjects.
With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight good training through projects, easy networking opportunities, and valuable workshops led by professionals.
Roughly 57% of reviews are negative, citing unengaged faculty and poor facilities. A smaller ~29% of feedback highlights supportive faculty and a diverse student body.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.
Nothing to show
This university is a flagship of French research. The best teachers teach the fruit of their research. It must also be said that everything is done so that the student can pass exams with quality libraries and optimal facilities. It's an honor to be a student!
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
I spent a year with PCA, and I am happy to be done with them. To highlight good things first, there are a handful of individuals at the school who really truly care about the students. The school also does a miraculous job of bringing together talented students from all over the globe. The students alone made the degree worth finishing. Other than that, I can't say much else that is good about PCA. The facilities are not good enough. As you've read already: no heat in the winter, ceiling panels that break and fall during class because of leaks in the ceilings, faulty printers, cramped studio spaces... I was part of the Interior Design Masters Program, and it felt like year one or two of an undergraduate degree. I did not feel challenged (besides my patience), and much of the work that I did for PCA was hijacked by professors with too-strong viewpoints. There is no accountability in regards to grading practices, so students are often graded by the personal preferences of the professor, rather than by the quality of work. For an art school, where creativity is King, this grading procedure is dangerous and counterintuitive. The school makes tons of promises to incoming students but fails every time to make these promises a reality. There is little to no help with finding a job or an internship after school. And CAP students, or students employed by the school, are overworked, underpaid, and disrespected. CAP employment is mandatory for undergrads and optional for grad students. CAP is recommended to students to help offset living costs in an expensive city like Paris, but the school holds 70% or more of your earned money until after you've graduated. Regarding VISA help, the school makes big promises about offering appointments and consultations for all your VISA questions but has a lot of trouble following up. My VISA appointment was cancelled 4 times in a row when my VISA deadline was just 3 weeks away. To prospective undergraduate students, PCA is not where you want to place your effort and love for your work. You will not receive the same treatment in return. To graduate students... pick anywhere else, unless you want to be treated like a child rather than the accomplished and talented professional you are.
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
Nothing to show
