London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Edinburgh Napier University vs London Metropolitan University vs University of East London - UEL vs Falmouth University

Side-by-side comparison from 617 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.60)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 3/7 categories
Edinburgh Napier University: wins 1/7 categories
London Metropolitan University: wins 0/7 categories
University of East London - UEL: wins 0/7 categories
Falmouth University: wins 0/7 categories
Ulster University: wins 1/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Edinburgh, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
47 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
45 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
104 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Management
Falmouth, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
46 reviews
×
Best programme: Theatre Arts
Belfast, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.31
4.04
4.30
4.24
4.07
4.40
Win
Location
4.78
Win
4.18
4.52
4.35
4.00
4.14
4.70
Professors
4.26
4.18
4.33
4.23
4.20
4.38
4.60
Win
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.15
4.50
4.25
4.07
4.09
4.60
Student life
3.64
4.18
Win
3.85
3.87
4.18
3.94
3.90
Value
4.04
4.03
4.02
4.13
4.07
4.28
Win
3.90
Accommodation
3.79
Win
3.67
3.43
3.33
3.76
3.59
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
  • +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
  • +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
  • +Industry-focused curriculum with practical skills
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Well-structured programs and learning environment
  • +Supportive faculty and mentorship
  • +Diverse and inclusive environment
  • +Career-focused and practical programs
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
  • +Practical, industry-relevant learning
  • +Friendly and diverse community
  • +Hands-on experience and industry opportunities
  • +Supportive faculty and accessible help
  • +Flexible course structure and modern facilities
  • +Strong academic programmes and industry-focused courses
  • +Supportive lecturers and a welcoming environment
  • +Excellent location and facilities
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
  • -Lack of structure and significant workload.
  • -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
  • -Unapproachable and neglectful lecturers.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Poor teaching quality and course structure.
  • -Inadequate facilities and lack of administrative support.
  • -Insufficient preparation for the professional world.
  • -Poor teaching quality and irrelevant course content.
  • -Lack of institutional support and inaccessible amenities.
  • -Ineffective administration and patronizing senior management.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -The campus facilities appear to be outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication and support from university staff are often perceived as lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

This institution achieves strong scores in several key areas, notably in **Facilities**, which stands out with the highest rating. Student life and location also received commendations, alongside professors and internationality, all scoring above 4.0. The weakest area highlighted is **Accommodation**, receiving the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture, with room for improvement in its housing provisions.

This institution excels in its Location and Internationality, both scoring 4.5. Professors also received a strong rating at 4.33. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area with a score of 3.43. Student Life and Facilities are rated moderately at 3.85 and 4.04 respectively, while Value is close behind at 4.02.

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its Location, scoring 4.35, closely followed by Facilities at 4.30 and Internationality at 4.25. Professors also received a solid rating of 4.23. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.33, while Student Life, at 3.87, is also an area with room for improvement. Value is rated moderately well at 4.13.

This institution demonstrates a strong showing in key areas, with **Facilities** receiving the highest rating at 4.24. **Professors** and **Student Life** also score well, both exceeding 4.1. Notably, **Accomodation** emerges as the area with the lowest rating, registering at 3.76. Other aspects like Location, Internationality, and Value are all rated solidly around the 4.0 mark.

This institution garners positive feedback across several key areas, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.38. **Value** also scores very well at 4.28. The university demonstrates a solid standing in **Location** (4.14) and **Internationality** (4.09), with **Facilities** also rated favorably at 4.07. **Student Life** is rated at 3.94, while **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.59.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.

~98% of 47 reviews are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers, practical and career-focused courses, and a well-structured learning environment. One negative review mentioned unapproachable lecturers.

Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive mentors, diverse environments, and career-focused programs. A small percentage (around 7%) of negative feedback mentions unprofessional teaching and poorly structured courses.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive tutors, practical learning, and personal growth. A small portion (~4%) of negative feedback mentions unhelpful staff or irrelevant course content.

Nearly all of the 46 reviews are positive, highlighting supportive faculty and excellent facilities. Students appreciate the hands-on experience and opportunities offered, with no negative feedback recorded.

With a 4.38/5 average rating from 39 reviews, ~97% of students expressed positive experiences. Praised themes include excellent courses, supportive lecturers, and a welcoming environment. A single negative review highlighted administrative issues.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
32%
47%
48%
35%
56%
60%
4★
44%
55%
38%
36%
52%
31%
40%
3★
18%
11%
9%
13%
13%
10%
0%
2★
2%
0%
4%
3%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
2%
2%
1%
0%
3%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Undergraduate Law

This university is welcoming and continually helpful by staff and pupils. I would recommend this university to new students. The law degree I am currently studying is exactly what I expected and is also very enjoyable.

International experience

LondonMet is a great place to have an international experience for foreign students @ different levels. Whether you may search for an affordable and certified executive studies or you may search for a multicultural experience meeting people from all over the world. I personally, find it a great option for a post graduate level of studies.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close