London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Greenwich - UoG vs ONCAMPUS Global vs University of Essex vs University of Plymouth
Side-by-side comparison from 550 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Diverse student body and international environment
- +Supportive and approachable faculty/teachers
- +Good facilities and varied course offerings
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Engaging and well-structured courses
- +Welcoming and inclusive campus environment
- +Supportive, expert lecturers and staff.
- +Well-equipped, modern facilities and resources.
- +Positive overall university experience and city location.
- +Strong teaching & knowledgeable staff
- +Excellent facilities & resources
- +Diverse student body & campus life
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Disappointing teaching quality and organizational issues
- -Disruptions from strikes and poor value for money
- -Lack of lecturer availability and communication problems
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Poor transport links and remote location.
- -Unsupportive teaching staff and unclear assignment guidance.
- -Unfair and nonsensical feedback on assignments.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administration and faculty.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources.
- -Lack of support and guidance from tutors.
- -University's poor response to crises and lack of student care.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in its **location** and **internationality**, both receiving high marks. **Accommodations** are rated the lowest among the surveyed categories. Other areas like **professors**, **facilities**, and **student life** all score well, indicating a generally positive experience. **Value** for money also registers favorably.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
Facilities and Internationality stand out as the university's strongest points, both receiving ratings above 4.3. Student Life and Value are also well-regarded. Conversely, Location and Accommodation show the lowest scores, though still generally positive. Professors and overall Student Life also indicate a solid performance.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving a perfect 4.41. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.21. **Professors** and **Value** are rated identically at 4.10, indicating a solid academic and financial standing. The university's **Internationality** scores a respectable 3.97. Its **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.66.
This institution demonstrates a commendable overall performance. Location stands out as its strongest attribute, achieving a near-perfect score. Student life and accommodation are areas with room for improvement, receiving the lowest ratings. Other aspects like facilities, professors, internationality, and value are rated positively, indicating a well-rounded academic environment.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
Approximately 98.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, helpful faculty, and good campus facilities. A small portion of feedback notes inconsistent teaching quality and organizational issues.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
~98.5% of 68 reviews are positive, highlighting welcoming campus culture, strong, supportive teaching, and approachable staff. One review expressed concerns about transport and feedback clarity.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~80% of feedback being highly favorable. Students praise the city's offerings, excellent course content, and supportive staff. No negative reviews were recorded.
With an average rating of 4.04/5, ~74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable staff, good facilities, and campus life. A small percentage (~4%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of opportunities and poor university response during COVID-19.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
