University of Oxford vs London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs The University of Edinburgh vs Hartpury College vs University of Suffolk - UoS

Side-by-side comparison from 664 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Hartpury College (5.00)
University of Oxford: wins 0/3 categories
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/3 categories
The University of Edinburgh: wins 0/3 categories
Hartpury College: wins 0/3 categories
University of Suffolk - UoS: wins 0/3 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/3 categories
Online Courses Learning: wins 3/3 categories
Comparing
Oxford, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
178 reviews
×
Best programme: Art History
Best programme: Economics
Edinburgh, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
129 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Hartpury, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Equine Business Management
Ipswich, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Public Health
Best programme: Culinary Arts
London, The United Kingdom
4.70
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Leadership
Category ratings
Facilities
4.19
4.05
4.33
5.00
4.05
4.40
5.00
Location
4.26
4.78
4.79
5.00
3.90
4.70
5.00
Professors
4.31
4.26
4.22
5.00
4.23
4.60
5.00
Internationality
4.18
4.80
4.53
5.00
4.34
4.60
5.00
Student life
4.16
3.65
4.44
4.00
3.58
3.90
5.00
Win
Value
4.19
4.05
4.02
4.50
4.27
3.90
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.94
3.80
3.86
4.00
3.44
3.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Welcoming community and strong sense of belonging
  • +High-quality, challenging education with expert professors
  • +Excellent facilities and supportive learning environment
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Excellent faculty dedication and engaging teaching.
  • +Diverse and inclusive community with numerous opportunities.
  • +High-quality facilities and resources for study.
  • +Attentive and helpful lecturers fostering a fun learning environment
  • +Excellent facilities and attractive campus with social spaces
  • +Beneficial combination of subject specializations and flexible learning methods
  • +Supportive faculty and personalized academic/personal assistance
  • +Flexible and high-quality learning experiences, both online and in-person
  • +Welcoming environment and enriching extracurricular opportunities
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +Flexible, self-paced learning
  • +Helpful instructors and fast support
  • +Relevant and high-quality course material
Cons
  • -Feeling like a number and experiencing unequal treatment.
  • -An overly competitive and cliquey social environment.
  • -A rigid and elitist institutional culture and admissions process.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues lead to a subpar student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and limited diversity are significant drawbacks.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Lack of clear communication and support
  • -Inadequate student support from the Students' Union.
  • -Small and insufficient modern facilities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Poor course structure and teaching quality detract from the learning experience.
Rating summary
What students say

Across various aspects, this institution demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in **Professors** with a rating of 4.31, closely followed by **Location** at 4.26. **Student Life** and **Value** also receive commendable scores around 4.19. The area that stands out as a relative weakness, though still a respectable 3.94, is **Accomodation**.

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

This institution garners exceptional marks, with Location standing out as its strongest asset at 4.79. Student Life and Internationality also receive high praise. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.86, indicating room for improvement. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Value fall within a generally positive range, suggesting a well-rounded academic environment.

Exceptional scores highlight this institution's strengths. Facilities, professors, and location all receive a perfect 5, indicating superior resources, academic quality, and geographical advantages. Student life and accommodation are also well-regarded with a 4. Internationality also scores a strong 5. The only area showing slight room for improvement is student life and accommodation, both rated 4, though the overall value is also very high at 4.5.

Evaluations reveal a university with particular strengths in Internationality, rated at 4.34, and Professors, at 4.23. Value for money also scores highly. Conversely, Accomodation emerges as the area with the lowest rating at 3.44, closely followed by Student Life at 3.58. Facilities and Location show solid, mid-range scores.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received perfect scores. Every aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodations, was rated a strong 5. Its prime location and international appeal also contributed to this uniformly excellent evaluation, indicating exceptional value for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on this data.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~88% of 177 reviews are positive, praising top-notch education, supportive professors, and a strong community. A small ~4.5% express dissatisfaction, feeling like a number or struggling with the competitive atmosphere.

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

With a 4.31 average rating from 130 reviews, ~85% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent faculty, facilities, and academic programs. Minor negative feedback (~0.8%) mentions cost and limited diversity.

With an average rating of 5/5 from two reviews, students are highly positive. Recurring themes include attentive lecturers and excellent facilities. There is no negative feedback.

~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting assignment-based assessments, helpful faculty, and a welcoming environment. A small portion (~7%) mentions issues with the Students' Union.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

All three reviews are positive, with students praising flexibility and helpful instructors. They highlight acquiring skills and the convenience of self-paced learning.

Rating distribution
5★
52%
34%
47%
100%
47%
60%
67%
4★
28%
44%
38%
0%
47%
40%
33%
3★
15%
18%
15%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
2%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
1%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Excellent academic environment

The university of Oxford is one of the oldest and most prestigious universities in the world, offers an unparalleled academic environment. Renowned for its rigorous academic programs, world-class faculty, and historic architecture, it attracts top students globally. Its fosters a strong sense of community and personalized learning. But its intense academic pressure and high cost of living in Oxford can be challenging for some students.

Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Great support from personal tutor and supervisor!

Overall the university is good, they have an easy way to apply for extensions on coursework, and special circumstances, which my personal tutor was more than happy to help with, she really was the best. My supervisor for my dissertation was also really supportive and helped through the challenging times. The lecturers are usually helpful if you are stuck, but there were some who would do the bare minimum for the students.

Nothing to show

Teaching, assessment, accessibility to study materials, interactiveness

Good university where you can get value for money. Assessments based on proposing solutions to problems faced by real-life organisations using business models. Teacher to student interaction is high and encouraged. I would recommend the University to anyone who wants to obtain a highly regarded graduate degree at an affordable cost

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close