The University of Manchester vs Alliance Manchester Business School vs Salford Business School vs The University of Law Business School vs General Assembly

Side-by-side comparison from 351 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
The University of Manchester: wins 0/5 categories
Alliance Manchester Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Salford Business School: wins 0/5 categories
The University of Law Business School: wins 0/5 categories
General Assembly: wins 2/5 categories
Mellor Financial Training: wins 0/5 categories
Global Banking School: wins 3/5 categories
Comparing
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
306 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: International Management
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
17 reviews
×
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
5.00
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
New York City, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Manchester, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Tourism Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
4.50
4.47
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.52
4.59
4.41
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.21
3.93
4.59
4.60
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.57
4.76
4.59
4.80
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.39
4.34
4.18
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.11
4.08
4.59
4.80
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.67
3.83
3.88
2.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging teaching and strong student support
  • +Excellent online learning experience and materials
  • +Vibrant student life and inspiring campus environment
  • +Expert, passionate instructors and well-structured, relevant courses.
  • +Real-world experience through consulting projects.
  • +Strong student support and career preparation resources.
  • +High-quality, relevant, and well-structured programmes.
  • +Supportive and accessible academic and administrative staff.
  • +Excellent online learning platform and extensive library resources.
  • +Supportive staff and wellbeing resources
  • +Smooth application process and fast feedback
  • +Career coaching and employable skills development
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Abundant study resources and learning activities
  • +Networking opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse teaching styles from various tutors
  • +Flexibility and adaptability fostered by module changes
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of access to functional labs.
  • -Disorganized course structure and poor lecturer communication/accessibility.
  • -Ineffective teaching that doesn't relate to assignments or career goals.
  • -Outdated curriculum and irrelevant course content
  • -Inadequate facilities and poor infrastructure
  • -Insufficient teaching time due to project focus
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -A lack of adequate resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance were major drawbacks.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty was a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -Inefficient administrative and communication processes.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant teaching.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong praise for its **Internationality** (4.57) and **Location** (4.52). **Facilities** (4.32), **Student Life** (4.39), and **Professors** (4.21) also receive positive marks, with **Value** (4.11) holding steady. The area with the lowest rating is **Accomodation** (3.67), indicating a potential point for improvement.

The university garners exceptional ratings for its Internationality (4.76) and Location (4.59), indicating strengths in these aspects. Facilities also received a high score (4.50). Conversely, Accomodation (3.83) and Professors (3.93) received the lowest scores, suggesting these are areas for potential improvement. Student Life (4.34) and Value (4.08) fall in the middle range.

This institution receives commendable ratings, particularly excelling in Professors, Internationality, and Value, all scoring an impressive 4.59. Facilities and Location are also highly rated at 4.47 and 4.41 respectively. Student Life is rated well at 4.18. The area with the lowest rating is Accomodation, coming in at 3.88.

This institution shines in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and location, alongside excellent marks for internationality and value. Student life receives a solid rating. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors are also highly regarded.

Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its teaching staff and international student experience, both receiving top marks. Its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are also highly regarded, all scoring a solid four out of five. While value for money is also rated at a perfect five, the professors and internationality stand out as the university's most impressive attributes.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a ~86% positive sentiment, students praise online/distance learning, engaging teaching, and strong support. A small minority, ~1.3%, reported issues with course content and professor accessibility.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable instructors, relevant coursework, and career support. A small portion of feedback points to issues with program structure and facilities.

All 17 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students highlight excellent modules, supportive staff, and high-quality education equipping them for real-life situations. The university's facilities and online learning platform are also frequently praised.

All five reviews are positive, with students praising supportive staff and departments, smooth application processes, and helpful career coaching. Resources like a large library and advance module content are also highlighted.

With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 0% negative sentiment. The reviewer appreciated the flexibility offered by having different tutors per module.

Rating distribution
5★
39%
52%
53%
100%
100%
0%
100%
4★
49%
24%
47%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
11%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Practical

The course content is well-structured and covers key areas such as digital forensics, threat intelligence, network security, incident response, and cyber risk management. One of the biggest strengths of the programme is its practical approach. Lab-based sessions, real-world case studies, and hands-on tools helped me understand how cyber attacks and investigations work in real scenarios. The lecturers are knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable, and they encourage critical thinking and independent research. The university also offers good learning resources, including online materials, libraries, and lab facilities. Group projects and assignments helped develop teamwork, problem-solving, and technical skills, which are very important for a career in cyber security. Overall, the programme prepared me well for further study and professional opportunities in the cyber security field. However, there are some areas that could be improved. In some modules, the workload was quite heavy within a short period, which made it challenging to manage deadlines. A few topics could have been explained in more depth, especially advanced threat intelligence and real-world industry tools. Additionally, more industry collaboration, internships, or career guidance would make the programme even stronger. Some technical resources and lab environments could also be updated to reflect the latest cyber security trends and technologies.

Nothing to show

QUALITY OF EDUCATION

University of Salford has one of the best standards and quality of education. Their courses are of high quality and they offer very good programmes.My time with the school has been very good as they are supportive in all areas of need and the school is very flexible in times of financial and academic challenges.

Amazing teaching

It’s a good place to study with lots of activities to do do and with a lot of useful resources as they have a 4 floor library which is great to find studies or even a quite place to study. The modules are set out perfectly with all the content already put up in advance for the students to have a look at so that they can study in advance and have a look through before lessons.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close