EU Business School vs IESE Business School vs Munich Business School - MBS vs Macromedia University of Applied Sciences vs Globe Business College Munich
Side-by-side comparison from 362 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, industry-focused learning and expert professors
- +Real-world application and out-of-class learning opportunities
- +Vibrant international student community and campus life
- +Inspiring cultural experiences and inclusive communities
- +Strong career advancement opportunities and alumni networks
- +High-quality academics and excellent faculty engagement
- +Practical, real-world preparation and career readiness.
- +International perspective and global network development.
- +Supportive community, dedicated faculty, and networking opportunities.
- +Broadened horizons and excellent networking
- +Valuable real-world experience through company work
- +Supportive and understanding staff
Nothing to show
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Practice-oriented courses and strong industry collaboration
- +Supportive and motivating instructors
- +Small class sizes and personalized attention
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Education quality is poor with outdated facilities and lack of resources.
- -Accreditation issues limit future opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and poor communication from staff are recurring problems.
- -Poor quality of education and lecturer qualifications.
- -High tuition fees disproportionate to class availability and contact hours.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Ineffective and outdated course content and teaching methods are a major concern.
- -Poorly managed administrative processes and lack of support are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
The university excels in its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.69), indicating a highly desirable and globally connected environment. **Student life** (4.17) also received a strong rating. The primary area for improvement lies in **accommodation** (3.48), which is the lowest-scoring category. Other aspects such as **facilities** (4.05), **professors** (3.98), and **value** (3.86) are rated moderately well.
Overall, the university garners strong student satisfaction. Its most highly rated aspects include Internationality (4.74), Location (4.73), and Student Life (4.70). Professors (4.62) and Value (4.64) also receive excellent scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is Accomodation at 4.09, while Facilities are rated at 4.36.
This institution receives high marks across most aspects of the student experience. Location and Student Life are particularly strong, both exceeding a 4.2 rating. Internationality also scores very well. The primary area for improvement seems to be Accommodation, which has the lowest rating at just under 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, and Value, are consistently rated above 4.1.
Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, earning a high score. Strong performance is also noted for **Location** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** received the lowest ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
This university receives particularly strong ratings in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. Other well-regarded aspects include **professors**, **location**, **student life**, **internationality**, and **value**, all scoring a solid 4.33. The lowest-rated area is **accommodation**, with a score of 3.67, indicating room for improvement in this specific category.
With ~74% positive reviews and an average rating of 3.82/5, students highlight industry-expert professors and practical, real-world learning. Around 8% of feedback noted disorganization and basic curriculum.
With a ~100% positive rating, reviews highlight exceptional experiences, transformative professional growth, and excellent faculty. Students praise the welcoming culture, global diversity, and strong career connections. No negative feedback was recorded.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93%), highlighting well-structured programs, supportive environments, and strong career preparation. Students appreciate the international perspective, networking opportunities, and practical teaching approaches. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 3/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is negative. Students cite concerns about academic quality and value for money. One positive review highlighted broad horizons and networking opportunities.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
With a 4.33/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight high-quality, practice-oriented courses, strong industry collaboration, and dedicated instructors. Some note large student numbers and limited staff as minor drawbacks.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
Being at IESE was one of the best experiences of my life: 1- Professionally: this MBA is one of the best connected schools with top consultancy and banking sectors. for example, the 3 MBBs come to the school to train and interview candidates, ensuring a higher successful rate. It allowed me to jump from a civil engineering position to work for McKinsey. 2- Personal and cultural : amazing transformative 2 years, with people from all over the world (73 nationalities in my class) with great values. Totally worthy it.
I studied for 4 months in MBS (I did my Erasmus there) and I have nothing but good and kind words for this place. Their methodology is much different than what I was used to in Barcelona: all the classes were practical, with little or none theory explained and everything explained through real-case scenarios or simulations. The fact that the teachers were, most of the times, business men and women that where working part-time as teachers, allowed students to learn current hot topics that were trending on some kinds of industry. Some of the subjects have no exams and instead they have a final project (for example, International Business Project of HR Management) that has to be done in groups, allowing yourself to develop teambuilding and teamworking skills. Also, the fact that classes are quite small allow for a better teacher-student communication. Other than that, the Erasmus Programme of this university is quite recognized worldwide, making students not just from Europe, but from the world, to go to study in MBS. The variety of cultures and people that you meet allow for a more, better open-minded way of thinking. Something I would recommend: International Business Project class and HR Management. Also, German can be learned in different levels according to your skills. Something that I did not like that much: the wifi was quite slow and it was hard to connect to sometimes. Hope they have improved it!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
