EU Business School vs IESE Business School vs Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich - LMU vs Macromedia University of Applied Sciences vs Globe Business College Munich
Side-by-side comparison from 377 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Inspiring cultural experiences and inclusive communities
- +Strong career advancement opportunities and alumni networks
- +High-quality academics and excellent faculty engagement
- +High-quality teaching and practical experience
- +Strong academic reputation and international environment
- +Well-organized programs with personalization options
- +Broadened horizons and excellent networking
- +Valuable real-world experience through company work
- +Supportive and understanding staff
Nothing to show
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Practice-oriented courses and strong industry collaboration
- +Supportive and motivating instructors
- +Small class sizes and personalized attention
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Poor quality of education and lecturer qualifications.
- -High tuition fees disproportionate to class availability and contact hours.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Ineffective and outdated course content and teaching methods are a major concern.
- -Poorly managed administrative processes and lack of support are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
Overall, the university garners strong student satisfaction. Its most highly rated aspects include Internationality (4.74), Location (4.73), and Student Life (4.70). Professors (4.62) and Value (4.64) also receive excellent scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is Accomodation at 4.09, while Facilities are rated at 4.36.
This institution garners strong marks across the board. Its **facilities** stand out with the highest rating at 4.27. The **value** proposition is also highly regarded, scoring 4.25. Areas like **professors**, **location**, and **student life** are all rated around 4.19-4.20, indicating solid performance. **Accommodation** is the relatively weakest area, though still positive at 4.04. **Internationality** also scores well at 4.15.
Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, earning a high score. Strong performance is also noted for **Location** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** received the lowest ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
This university receives particularly strong ratings in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. Other well-regarded aspects include **professors**, **location**, **student life**, **internationality**, and **value**, all scoring a solid 4.33. The lowest-rated area is **accommodation**, with a score of 3.67, indicating room for improvement in this specific category.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
With a ~100% positive rating, reviews highlight exceptional experiences, transformative professional growth, and excellent faculty. Students praise the welcoming culture, global diversity, and strong career connections. No negative feedback was recorded.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~98%), with an average rating of 4.08/5. Students praise the high quality of teaching, practical project opportunities, and enriching international environment. Negative feedback is negligible.
With an average rating of 3/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is negative. Students cite concerns about academic quality and value for money. One positive review highlighted broad horizons and networking opportunities.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
With a 4.33/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight high-quality, practice-oriented courses, strong industry collaboration, and dedicated instructors. Some note large student numbers and limited staff as minor drawbacks.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Being at IESE was one of the best experiences of my life: 1- Professionally: this MBA is one of the best connected schools with top consultancy and banking sectors. for example, the 3 MBBs come to the school to train and interview candidates, ensuring a higher successful rate. It allowed me to jump from a civil engineering position to work for McKinsey. 2- Personal and cultural : amazing transformative 2 years, with people from all over the world (73 nationalities in my class) with great values. Totally worthy it.
There are superior facilities at the FH Aachen. The tutorial halls and classes are sophisticated, equipped with the the current and innovative equipment, and the library is large and well-stocked. To guarantee that students have a positive college experience, the educational facility also offers a range of extracurricular activities and events.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
