EU Business School vs CBS International Business School - CBS vs Macromedia University of Applied Sciences vs New European College vs University of Kiel
Side-by-side comparison from 264 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical learning & industry expert professors
- +Real-world application & career opportunities
- +Vibrant student life & global diversity
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty with real-world experience
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum and learning opportunities
- +Modern campus facilities and networking opportunities
- +Broadened horizons and excellent networking
- +Valuable real-world experience through company work
- +Supportive and understanding staff
- +Supportive, family-like community and approachable, helpful lecturers
- +Personalized attention and mentorship throughout the academic journey
- +Beyond academics, including city orientation and flexible admissions
- +Rigorous chemistry foundation prepares for advanced studies.
- +Practical and theoretical learning through well-designed curricula.
- +Strong emphasis on job-relevant skills and future career prospects.
- +Opportunities for international and multicultural exposure.
- +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
- +Practical experience and career advancement support
- -Administrative and management issues create disorganization and unhelpful staff.
- -The educational quality is basic, with little support for extracurriculars and outdated facilities.
- -The university is perceived as a business focused on profit over student education and well-being.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities
- -Lack of engagement from instructors
- -Poor quality of education and lecturer qualifications.
- -High tuition fees disproportionate to class availability and contact hours.
- -Unresponsive or ineffective administrative and management support.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication regarding academic and administrative matters.
- -Lack of support for international students and a significant language barrier.
- -Social science programs are underdeveloped.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a frequent complaint.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with administrative inefficiencies and poor communication.
- -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
- -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
This university excels in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring very highly. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also received favorable ratings. The **weakest area** for the institution is **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. **Value** and **Professors** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas with room for improvement.
This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. It particularly excels in **Internationality**, receiving the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also score exceptionally well, reflecting positive student experiences. While most aspects are strong, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. The overall assessment indicates a well-rounded university with some room for improvement in housing.
Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, earning a high score. Strong performance is also noted for **Location** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** received the lowest ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Overall, this university receives very positive ratings from students. The strongest areas of performance are Internationality, with a near-perfect score, closely followed by Professors and Location. Accomodation and Facilities represent the weakest, though still generally favorable, aspects of the student experience. The university also scores well in Student Life and Value.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its facilities, earning a respectable 3.5 out of 5. Conversely, areas requiring improvement include accommodation, rated at a low 2, and professors, location, and student life, all scoring 2.5. While internationality is rated moderately at 3, the university's value for money stands out as its strongest attribute, achieving a high 4.
Considering the provided ratings, the university presents a uniformly neutral profile, with no specific areas standing out as particularly strong or weak. Every surveyed aspect, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, received a rating of zero. This suggests a consistent, albeit unremarkable, performance across all evaluated facets of the university experience.
Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.
Most reviews (around 74%) are positive, highlighting practical learning and industry-expert professors. A smaller portion (~8.3%) of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and basic education.
With ~92% positive sentiment, reviews highlight knowledgeable, supportive professors and an engaging, practical curriculum. Students appreciate the modern campus and networking opportunities, though some desire more career-focused events.
With an average rating of 3/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is negative. Students cite concerns about academic quality and value for money. One positive review highlighted broad horizons and networking opportunities.
Students praise NEC for its personal attention from approachable lecturers and a supportive, family-like community. The college exceeded expectations, offering a valuable experience beyond academics.
With a 2.5/5 average rating from two reviews, sentiment is split evenly. One reviewer highlights challenging but rewarding chemistry studies, while the other notes shortcomings in social sciences and minimal support for international students.
Students highlight excellent laboratory facilities, a well-designed curriculum for practical and job-related knowledge, and good international exposure. The average rating is 4/5, with positive feedback representing 100% of reviews.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.
I love to take a path in a good environment to perform my ability to intend all the perspective that matches and are suitable for every student in daily lifestyle and work in a way which will be helpful for the needs or students to get higher oppurtuinitied
I've had a good experience so far while I've been studying at CBS. However, the majority of students are of German nationality, while there are also students from other nations. If you're feeling under the weather or don't feel like going to school, they provide a blended learning option that allows you to stay at home and participate in the class simultaneously online. The campus in Cologne is not particularly cutting-edge, but I've heard that the campus in Mainz is more or less cutting-edge and attractive. The instructors and departmental officials are all cordial. The School encourages pupils to participate in a variety of sports because it values a healthy balance between work and recreation. As a result of CBS's partnerships with various significant businesses, the School is able to maintain its curricula current with the needs of the modern business world. Additionally, partnerships allow CBS to give its students greater options for internships and professional experience. By participating in business projects in collaboration with well-known companies, students can also gain important information and skills.
Nothing to show
Initially, NEC was not my first choice of university, but one of the top three when choosing a master programme. This was due to a specific programme I was searching for not being offered. As my enquiry progressed, this university quickly became my first choice. The staff was very responsive and fast, made up of some of the kindest people I have met. They were able to guide me through the process and answer all the questions I had. Further, the chancellor has been very hands on from the beginning of the journey, with an open inbox and an open door. He is able to help his students not only in relation to the university but any guidance which is needed for students in a new city or country. The professors chosen have been a part of NEC for many years and bring a wide variety of industry knowledge. Their unique master programme has been exciting, interesting and relevant to the current day scenarios. It has been the right amount of challenging but all worth it. The environment is one of the most welcoming and supportive that I have ever experienced, and I would recommend New European College to anyone who is passionate about their future and education.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
