EU Business School vs Karlsruhe Institute of Technology - KIT vs CBS International Business School - CBS vs Karlshochschule International University vs Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 274 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Knowledgeable and experienced professors with practical insights
- +Innovative and engaging business programs
- +High degree of course choice and specialization options
- +Strong research focus and thesis topic availability
- +Vibrant student life and community engagement
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Modern and spacious campus facilities
- +Collaborative and inclusive learning environment
- +Approachable and excellent professors
- +Internationality and diversity fostered
- +Strong practical skills focus
- +Good career prospects post-graduation
- +Experienced and knowledgeable faculty
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Strong technology, entrepreneurship, and innovation focus
- +Small classes and personal lecturer/staff experience
- +Excellent value for money and career/life start opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -The quality of education and teaching is often perceived as basic and unengaging.
- -Facilities and academic support are frequently criticized as inadequate.
- -Overwhelming workload and lack of breaks are a major concern.
- -Administrative and organizational issues cause significant frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent and unsupportive teaching or academic guidance is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are described as outdated and in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
- -Poor administrative processes and unresponsive management.
- -Inadequate and outdated campus facilities.
- -Lack of clear communication and course planning.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and course organization leads to confusion.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring very highly. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also received positive marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. **Professors** and **Value** fall within a moderate range, suggesting a generally positive but not exceptional experience in these aspects.
An excellent location and impressive facilities are clear highlights in these university ratings. Student life and accommodation, however, represent areas with lower scores, suggesting potential room for improvement in those aspects. The institution also garners strong marks for internationality and value.
This university receives strong commendations in several key areas, notably Internationality (4.69) and Facilities (4.62). Student Life also scores highly at 4.54. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the lowest-rated aspect (3.62). Professors and Value are rated comparably well at 4.46 each. Location also receives a solid score of 4.
An impressive profile emerges from these university ratings. Student life and internationality stand out with perfect scores, indicating a vibrant and globally diverse campus experience. Professors and location also received very strong marks, suggesting excellent academic support and a desirable setting. However, accommodation presents a notable weakness, rated significantly lower than other aspects.
This university excels in several key areas, receiving top marks for its **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring a perfect 5. **Facilities** and **Value** also stand out with impressive 4.5 ratings. Conversely, **Professors** represent the weakest area, earning a modest 3. **Accommodations** and **Internationality** fall in the middle range at 3.5.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
This institution excels in several key areas, earning perfect scores for Professors and Accomodation, and near-perfect ratings for Facilities and Student Life. Its strongest aspects clearly lie in the academic and living experiences offered. Conversely, the university's Internationality and Value for money received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories, indicating areas where there is room for improvement.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting diverse networks, knowledgeable professors, and an engaging international environment. A small percentage of feedback (~7.7%) notes disorganization and basic education.
Approximately 80% of reviews are positive, praising course flexibility, specialized directions, and campus environment. A small portion (around 20%) of feedback mentions disorganization and limited breaks.
Nearly all ~92% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable and supportive professors, practical lessons, and a modern campus. A small portion (~8%) suggests more career-focused events would be beneficial.
Students report a highly positive experience, citing collaborative, international, and diverse learning environments with approachable professors. The university fosters inclusivity and academic support, preparing graduates for their fields. One review noted high tuition fees could be better matched with practical resources.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is predominantly positive (~100%). Students highlight a strong balance of theoretical and practical learning, leading to good job prospects after graduation.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship, small class sizes, and a positive learning experience. No negative feedback was provided.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
Nothing to show
I've had a good experience so far while I've been studying at CBS. However, the majority of students are of German nationality, while there are also students from other nations. If you're feeling under the weather or don't feel like going to school, they provide a blended learning option that allows you to stay at home and participate in the class simultaneously online. The campus in Cologne is not particularly cutting-edge, but I've heard that the campus in Mainz is more or less cutting-edge and attractive. The instructors and departmental officials are all cordial. The School encourages pupils to participate in a variety of sports because it values a healthy balance between work and recreation. As a result of CBS's partnerships with various significant businesses, the School is able to maintain its curricula current with the needs of the modern business world. Additionally, partnerships allow CBS to give its students greater options for internships and professional experience. By participating in business projects in collaboration with well-known companies, students can also gain important information and skills.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Excellent small school with a strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship; small classes; personal experience with lecturers and staff; well-designed curriculum; good lectures and interesting guest lecturers; a lot of traveling if you don't live in Hamburg's south, but manageable for three semesters; excellent value for money compared to UK/US schools, even without receiving one of the many scholarships; financial breakeven in less than two years; well-known in northern Germany, but now more so in central Europe; each class has one or two larger successful startups, with founders frequently giving lectures on campus; the alumni network feels more like a family than a pure "business network"; the new CEO is driving growth; and there are plenty of opportunities and support provided for extracurricular activities, initiatives, etc.
