EU Business School vs Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich - LMU vs Munich Business School - MBS vs Hochschule Fresenius vs TUM School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 341 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert professors and practical, real-world business applications
- +Strong emphasis on hands-on experience and out-of-class learning
- +Vibrant international student community and engaging campus life
- +High-quality academics and practical, project-based learning.
- +Excellent international environment and diverse specialization options.
- +Strong reputation, research opportunities, and no tuition fees for many programs.
- +Practical, real-world preparation and career readiness.
- +International perspective and global network development.
- +Supportive community, dedicated faculty, and networking opportunities.
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Practice-oriented courses and strong industry collaboration
- +Supportive and motivating instructors
- +Small class sizes and personalized attention
Nothing to show
- +Excellent teaching and motivating academic environment
- +Strong international reputation and career opportunities
- +Innovative research and modern facilities
- -Disorganization, poor staff support, and lack of clear academic guidance are significant issues.
- -Educational quality is perceived as basic, with issues in course content, teaching, and study facilities.
- -Administrative problems, lack of accreditation, and a focus on profit over education are recurring complaints.
- -Disorganized and unsupportive administrative and management processes are a constant source of frustration.
- -Inadequate resources, including outdated facilities and insufficient technology, hinder effective learning.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient individual attention leave students feeling overlooked and unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and poor communication from staff are recurring problems.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Ineffective and outdated course content and teaching methods are a major concern.
- -Poorly managed administrative processes and lack of support are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
Nothing to show
- -Poor communication and disorganization from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of engaging or relevant course content.
This university demonstrates significant strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring notably high. Student life and facilities also received positive marks. However, accommodation emerged as the weakest area, reflecting a potential point of concern. Professors and the overall value proposition are rated moderately well, indicating a generally solid but improvable performance in these aspects.
Across a range of key metrics, the university demonstrates generally strong performance. Its **Facilities** and **Value** received particularly high marks, indicating satisfaction in these areas. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also scored well. While still rated positively, **Accomodation** appears to be the comparatively weakest area, alongside **Professors** and **Location**, which received slightly lower, though still favorable, scores.
This institution receives high marks across most aspects of the student experience. Location and Student Life are particularly strong, both exceeding a 4.2 rating. Internationality also scores very well. The primary area for improvement seems to be Accommodation, which has the lowest rating at just under 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, and Value, are consistently rated above 4.1.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
This university receives particularly strong ratings in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. Other well-regarded aspects include **professors**, **location**, **student life**, **internationality**, and **value**, all scoring a solid 4.33. The lowest-rated area is **accommodation**, with a score of 3.67, indicating room for improvement in this specific category.
Nothing to show
This institution garners outstanding marks across most aspects, with a perfect score in Internationality. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Student Life all received a strong 4.5, indicating excellent offerings in these key areas. Accommodation, while good at 4, represents the lowest-rated category. Value is also highly regarded at 4.5.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning, industry expert professors, and engaging classes. A small percentage of feedback (~8%) is negative, citing disorganization and basic education.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.06/5. Students praise high-quality teaching, research focus, and valuable practical experience. International exposure and program flexibility are also highlighted.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93%), highlighting well-structured programs, supportive environments, and strong career preparation. Students appreciate the international perspective, networking opportunities, and practical teaching approaches. No negative feedback was recorded.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
With a 4.33/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight high-quality, practice-oriented courses, strong industry collaboration, and dedicated instructors. Some note large student numbers and limited staff as minor drawbacks.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise excellent teaching, innovative research, and strong career opportunities.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
There are superior facilities at the FH Aachen. The tutorial halls and classes are sophisticated, equipped with the the current and innovative equipment, and the library is large and well-stocked. To guarantee that students have a positive college experience, the educational facility also offers a range of extracurricular activities and events.
I studied for 4 months in MBS (I did my Erasmus there) and I have nothing but good and kind words for this place. Their methodology is much different than what I was used to in Barcelona: all the classes were practical, with little or none theory explained and everything explained through real-case scenarios or simulations. The fact that the teachers were, most of the times, business men and women that where working part-time as teachers, allowed students to learn current hot topics that were trending on some kinds of industry. Some of the subjects have no exams and instead they have a final project (for example, International Business Project of HR Management) that has to be done in groups, allowing yourself to develop teambuilding and teamworking skills. Also, the fact that classes are quite small allow for a better teacher-student communication. Other than that, the Erasmus Programme of this university is quite recognized worldwide, making students not just from Europe, but from the world, to go to study in MBS. The variety of cultures and people that you meet allow for a more, better open-minded way of thinking. Something I would recommend: International Business Project class and HR Management. Also, German can be learned in different levels according to your skills. Something that I did not like that much: the wifi was quite slow and it was hard to connect to sometimes. Hope they have improved it!
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
