EU Business School vs WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management vs CBS International Business School - CBS vs Kühne Logistics University - KLU vs Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Side-by-side comparison from 332 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Excellent faculty and practical learning experiences
- +International exposure and real-world business cases
- +Engaging program with opportunities for skill development and creativity
- +Practical learning with real-world experience and project-based focus
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors with a focus on student growth
- +International environment and networking opportunities
- +Supportive people and approachable professors
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Strong networking and international community
- +Engaging, mentor-like faculty and personalized learning.
- +Innovative, thought-provoking curriculum with a sustainability focus.
- +Supportive and friendly atmosphere fostering personal development.
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Integrated business and technology education for practical application.
- +Small class sizes and personal lecturer/staff interaction.
- +Strong focus on entrepreneurship and innovation.
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues create a sense of being taken advantage of.
- -Inconsistent teacher quality is a recurring concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Administrative issues, including poor communication and disorganized processes, are a major source of frustration.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in the curriculum disappoints students.
- -Poor English proficiency of professors and lectures partially in German.
- -Unwelcoming atmosphere due to disrespectful staff and negative peer interactions.
- -Disappointment with program content and its deviation from advertised offerings.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring complaints.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
Overall, this university garners very positive feedback. Its strongest aspects include excellent Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring a high 4.5. Value is also rated highly at 4.5. Areas with slightly lower scores are Student Life and Internationality, both at 3.5. Accommodations received a solid 4.
This university receives excellent feedback, particularly for its professors and internationality, both scoring approximately 4.48. Student life also scores highly at around 4.47. The weakest area is accommodation, with a rating of 3.61. Facilities are rated at 4.35, location at 4, and value at about 4.14, indicating generally positive perceptions across most aspects of the university experience.
Examining the provided ratings reveals a university excelling in several key aspects. Its location stands out with an impressive score of 4.89, closely followed by strong performance in internationality (4.8), facilities (4.6), student life (4.6), and professors (4.65). However, accommodation presents a clear area for improvement, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, while value remains solid at 4.55.
Overall, the university receives a mixed but generally positive reception. Student life stands out as its strongest attribute, with an impressive rating of 4.17. Location also scores highly at 3.95. Conversely, the rating for professors is the lowest at 2.83, indicating an area for potential improvement. Other categories like facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value fall within a moderate range.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This institution garners exceptional ratings in several key areas. Professors and accommodation stand out with perfect scores, indicating a highly valued academic staff and excellent housing options. Student life and facilities also received near-perfect marks, suggesting a vibrant campus environment and well-equipped resources. Conversely, internationality and value represent the weaker aspects, with ratings of 4.4, suggesting potential areas for enhancement in global engagement and affordability.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (100% positive reviews) with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight experienced professors, a strong mix of theory and practical application, and enjoyable staff and fellow students.
With a 4.25/5 average rating from 24 reviews, ~92% of students had a positive experience. Praised themes include project-based learning, professors' real-world experience, and networking opportunities. A small ~4% of feedback mentioned administrative issues.
With an average rating of 4.76/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight supportive professors, a personal learning environment with small classes, and practical, real-world experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.
Most students find the university enriching, with engaging classes and supportive mentors. Some highlight its unique sustainability focus and welcoming atmosphere. A smaller portion of feedback mentions issues with professors' English proficiency and unwelcoming program experiences.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
All 6 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students highlight the strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship, practical learning, and a welcoming atmosphere. No negative feedback was reported.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Amazing program, it provides the perfect blend and opportunity to learn skills and also explore your creativity. Most professors are very experienced and well known within their field of expertise. Some are outstanding and provide you with great knowledge. There is a lot of emphases given to practical learning and group projects. WHU staff, as well as students, were good fun.
I've had a good experience so far while I've been studying at CBS. However, the majority of students are of German nationality, while there are also students from other nations. If you're feeling under the weather or don't feel like going to school, they provide a blended learning option that allows you to stay at home and participate in the class simultaneously online. The campus in Cologne is not particularly cutting-edge, but I've heard that the campus in Mainz is more or less cutting-edge and attractive. The instructors and departmental officials are all cordial. The School encourages pupils to participate in a variety of sports because it values a healthy balance between work and recreation. As a result of CBS's partnerships with various significant businesses, the School is able to maintain its curricula current with the needs of the modern business world. Additionally, partnerships allow CBS to give its students greater options for internships and professional experience. By participating in business projects in collaboration with well-known companies, students can also gain important information and skills.
My experience at KLU has truly been life-changing. This university has given me a second chance and opened the door to a completely new life filled with opportunities. From the very beginning, it has felt like a second home. What makes KLU so special is the people. Every single person here is supportive and genuinely willing to help. The professors are not only highly qualified and professional, but also approachable and always ready to guide you in any academic or professional matter. I have never been in a place like this before. The strong connection with industry, the quality of events, and the incredible network of classmates and alumni create the perfect environment for both personal and professional growth. I will always be grateful to KLU for everything I have experienced here.
Perhaps, it was my most disapointing experience of studying abroad. What was meant to be Liberal Arts and Sciences, at the end was the opposite of it. Completely disrepsectful attitudes of stuff created very unwelcoming atmosphere. I wouldn't recommend this programme to any of my friends. Regarding the fellow-students, it was neither appealing. They could look at me pejoratively or just say 'Ou, it's you?..". It was the most racist programme and I regret I got to know people I met there, including stuff. They looked down upon me and compeletely ignored my opinions, feelings. In total, very racist place, and fascist. Regarding you career opportunities, you can ask your stuff, but I wish people who work there now, would work in what was meant to be Liberal Arts and Sciences. Stuff and honestly, fellow-students rather represented for me fashist arts and sciences. It was most humiliating, degrading ,disgusting experience in all my life. I'm surprised that this kind of attitudes can be met in the European university. Maybe you can try your luck in other Leuphana programmes: I had sometimes great experinces with professors and students from other faculties, but B.A. Studium Individuale is the most racist, fascist, worst place I've ever been. Till now, very unpleasant aftertaste from all people I met there.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
This was the best Varsity ever. The professionalism is on the high level. I have no dislikes and I highly recommend it to people who are struggling with focus. It's takes special students with disabilities.
