EU Business School vs Landshut University vs Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich - LMU vs Technical University of Munich - TUM vs Hochschule München University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 393 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, industry-focused learning and expert professors
- +Real-world application and out-of-class learning opportunities
- +Vibrant international student community and campus life
- +Outstanding learning climate, professors, and learning success
- +Easy to get to know many people due to campus size
- +High-quality academics and practical, project-based learning.
- +Excellent international environment and diverse specialization options.
- +Strong reputation, research opportunities, and no tuition fees for many programs.
- +Diverse and customizable specialization options
- +High academic standards and strong career prospects
- +Excellent support for international students
- +Welcoming staff, helpful student buddies, and supportive community
- +Strong industry co-op and career-focused programs
- +Excellent campus facilities and central Munich location
- +Supportive, family-like community and approachable, helpful lecturers
- +Personalized attention and mentorship throughout the academic journey
- +Beyond academics, including city orientation and flexible admissions
- +Practice-oriented courses and strong industry collaboration
- +Supportive and motivating instructors
- +Small class sizes and personalized attention
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Education quality is poor with outdated facilities and lack of resources.
- -Accreditation issues limit future opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary frustrations.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Inconsistent quality of instruction and curriculum concerns arise.
- -Disorganized and unsupportive administrative and management processes are a constant source of frustration.
- -Inadequate resources, including outdated facilities and insufficient technology, hinder effective learning.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient individual attention leave students feeling overlooked and unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder student progress and fair assessment.
- -Outdated facilities and inefficient systems create frustrating learning environments.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent complaints.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Unresponsive or ineffective administrative and management support.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication regarding academic and administrative matters.
- -Ineffective and outdated course content and teaching methods are a major concern.
- -Poorly managed administrative processes and lack of support are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
The university excels in its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.69), indicating a highly desirable and globally connected environment. **Student life** (4.17) also received a strong rating. The primary area for improvement lies in **accommodation** (3.48), which is the lowest-scoring category. Other aspects such as **facilities** (4.05), **professors** (3.98), and **value** (3.86) are rated moderately well.
This university presents a uniform performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, there are no distinct areas of strength or weakness to highlight. The institution's standing is consistent across every surveyed metric.
Across a range of key metrics, the university demonstrates generally strong performance. Its **Facilities** and **Value** received particularly high marks, indicating satisfaction in these areas. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also scored well. While still rated positively, **Accomodation** appears to be the comparatively weakest area, alongside **Professors** and **Location**, which received slightly lower, though still favorable, scores.
A notable range of scores characterizes this university's performance. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, reflecting a high degree of global engagement. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest rating, suggesting this may be an area for improvement. Other categories like Facilities, Location, and Value also scored very well, indicating a generally positive university experience. Student Life and Professors also maintained respectable scores.
Considerably positive feedback is evident across most surveyed aspects. The university excels notably in **Internationality**, receiving its highest score, closely followed by **Professors** and **Value**. The weakest area is **Facilities**, which received the lowest rating. Other categories such as Location, Student Life, and Accomodation all received solid scores around the 4.0 mark.
Overall, this university receives very positive ratings from students. The strongest areas of performance are Internationality, with a near-perfect score, closely followed by Professors and Location. Accomodation and Facilities represent the weakest, though still generally favorable, aspects of the student experience. The university also scores well in Student Life and Value.
This university receives particularly strong ratings in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. Other well-regarded aspects include **professors**, **location**, **student life**, **internationality**, and **value**, all scoring a solid 4.33. The lowest-rated area is **accommodation**, with a score of 3.67, indicating room for improvement in this specific category.
With ~74% positive reviews and an average rating of 3.82/5, students highlight industry-expert professors and practical, real-world learning. Around 8% of feedback noted disorganization and basic curriculum.
With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, this university is highly recommended. Students praise the outstanding learning climate, professors, and learning success. The campus size facilitates making new connections.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.06/5. Students praise high-quality teaching, research focus, and valuable practical experience. International exposure and program flexibility are also highlighted.
With an average rating of 4.07/5 from 100 reviews, ~95% of students are positive. They highlight diverse specializations, high academic standards leading to good job prospects, and excellent professor support. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned overlapping course schedules.
All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students praise the welcoming staff and students, English-taught programs, and strong industry connections. Accommodation and campus facilities are also highlighted.
Students praise NEC for its personal attention from approachable lecturers and a supportive, family-like community. The college exceeded expectations, offering a valuable experience beyond academics.
With a 4.33/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight high-quality, practice-oriented courses, strong industry collaboration, and dedicated instructors. Some note large student numbers and limited staff as minor drawbacks.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
Nothing to show
There are superior facilities at the FH Aachen. The tutorial halls and classes are sophisticated, equipped with the the current and innovative equipment, and the library is large and well-stocked. To guarantee that students have a positive college experience, the educational facility also offers a range of extracurricular activities and events.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Initially, NEC was not my first choice of university, but one of the top three when choosing a master programme. This was due to a specific programme I was searching for not being offered. As my enquiry progressed, this university quickly became my first choice. The staff was very responsive and fast, made up of some of the kindest people I have met. They were able to guide me through the process and answer all the questions I had. Further, the chancellor has been very hands on from the beginning of the journey, with an open inbox and an open door. He is able to help his students not only in relation to the university but any guidance which is needed for students in a new city or country. The professors chosen have been a part of NEC for many years and bring a wide variety of industry knowledge. Their unique master programme has been exciting, interesting and relevant to the current day scenarios. It has been the right amount of challenging but all worth it. The environment is one of the most welcoming and supportive that I have ever experienced, and I would recommend New European College to anyone who is passionate about their future and education.
Nothing to show
