NABA – New Academy of Fine Arts vs Università di Roma Tor Vergata - uniroma2 vs Rome Business School vs Guglielmo Marconi University vs European School of Economics - ESE
Side-by-side comparison from 155 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Outstanding teachers and a supportive, family-like community.
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth in a well-resourced environment.
- +An international atmosphere with diverse student interactions.
- +Excellent career preparation and university reputation
- +Modern facilities and enriching academic/personal growth opportunities
- +Supportive environment, especially for international students
- +Practical, real-world application of knowledge
- +Quality of lecturers and academic team mentorship
- +Industry connections and company visits
- +Relevant and in-depth subject matter
- +Competent and knowledgeable professors
- +Convenient telematics access
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- +Structured learning and international community
- +Positive location and good opportunities
- +Flexible online learning options
- +Diverse course offerings and progression
- +Ongoing improvements to course materials
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support, are frequently criticized.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Speedy courses with a lack of depth and outdated curriculum.
- -Poor administrative support and unmotivated professors.
- -Dilapidated and lacking infrastructure.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern, including unfulfilled promises, demands for extra fees, and communication breakdowns.
- -Outdated course content and lack of practical opportunities like internships are disappointing.
- -The institution's unprofessionalism and perceived dishonesty are major drawbacks.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
- -Inflexible and poorly communicated academic policies frustrate students.
- -Limited career services and support hinder post-graduation prospects.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Lack of effective communication
- -Outdated and poor-quality course materials and platform.
- -Sudden and disruptive changes to course content and exam procedures.
- -Lack of value for money due to low-quality education.
This institution receives commendations across several key areas. Its strongest performance is in **Internationality**, with a rating of 4.67. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value are also highly rated, each scoring 4.33. Student Life and Accomodation are solid, both receiving a score of 4.
Internationality and Professors are the university's strongest rated areas. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Facilities, Student Life, and Value also demonstrate solid performance, while Location sits in the mid-range. The overall impression is one of a university excelling in academic and global aspects, with room for improvement in student housing.
This university garners strong approval, particularly excelling in **Internationality** and **Location**, both rated very highly. **Professors** and **Value** also received excellent scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a noticeably lower rating compared to other aspects. Student life and facilities also maintain positive, though less exceptional, scores.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings, with high ratings for Professors and Value. Conversely, several core areas require substantial improvement. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation all received zero ratings, indicating considerable deficiencies. Internationality presents a moderate but still underdeveloped aspect, with a rating of two.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
With exceptional scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality, the university demonstrates considerable strengths. Student Life and Value also receive positive feedback, indicating a generally well-rounded experience. The primary area for improvement lies in Accomodation, which received the lowest rating.
Here's a summary of the university ratings:
This institution shows its strongest performance in Location, receiving a high rating of 4.33. Conversely, Internationality stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2. Other aspects such as Facilities, Accomodation, and Value are rated moderately at 3. Professors are rated slightly higher at 3.33, while Student Life scores a lower 2.67.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.38/5. Students consistently praise outstanding teachers, a supportive environment with compassionate individuals, and abundant resources, fostering personal growth and strong connections.
With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~84% of reviews are positive, highlighting comprehensive programs, excellent preparation, and modern facilities. A small portion (~4.6%) express concerns about rushed courses and lack of depth.
Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting valuable program content and practical industry connections. A small portion (~7%) of negative feedback concerns administrative issues and unmet expectations.
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students highlight well-suited second-year subjects, particularly in marketing and computer science, taught by competent professors.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Based on one review, the university receives a 4/5 rating. The program is praised for its structure and international community, though some opportunities may be less accessible than presented.
Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility with online learning and platform usability. One review expresses significant dissatisfaction with outdated content and platform issues.
I liked the ambiant, the friendly people, professional professors, the care of details. I had the opportunity to improve myself and find out more about me, my skills and what I'm looking for in a job.
The University of Rome tor Vergata is a great and relevantly young University, which is becoming each academic year stronger and more valuable. I graduated from the Global Governance bachelor's degree in English which presented a very interdisciplinary, interconnected and international programme to its students. It is focused on the great challenges and relevant matters of nowadays' world, which shape a strong basis for the next generations of workers and leaders of the upcoming years.
Enrolling in the International Master in Project Management has been an incredible milestone for my professional development. The curriculum perfectly balances core theoretical methodologies with practical, real-world case studies, making every concept immediately applicable to real workplace scenarios. Beyond the quality of the coursework, what truly sets this program apart is the level of mentorship. I am deeply grateful to Gianmarco and the entire academic team for their hands-on support, responsiveness, and continuous guidance throughout the journey. I highly recommend this master’s program to any professional looking to refine their strategic mindset, sharpen their leadership capabilities, and elevate their career in project management.
Nothing to show
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
