Kühne Logistics University - KLU vs ICN Business School vs Université de Lorraine vs École Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaire - ENSAIA vs CESI
Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive people and approachable professors
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Strong networking and international community
- +Diverse and international student body
- +Affordable and convenient programs
- +Strong academic reputation and programs
- +Exceptional academic programs and quality education
- +Supportive and approachable faculty and researchers
- +Lively campus with good opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Clear program specialization after common core
- +Focused agricultural and food industry engineering education
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Engaging professors and quality of classes
- +Positive university atmosphere and facilities
- +Excellent sports activities
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Administrative issues, including poor communication and disorganized processes, are a major source of frustration.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in the curriculum disappoints students.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues hinder progress.
- -Outdated facilities and technology create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors and the institution causes frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources were frequently mentioned.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations led to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency are prevalent concerns.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
Examining the provided ratings reveals a university excelling in several key aspects. Its location stands out with an impressive score of 4.89, closely followed by strong performance in internationality (4.8), facilities (4.6), student life (4.6), and professors (4.65). However, accommodation presents a clear area for improvement, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, while value remains solid at 4.55.
Overall, this institution receives positive evaluations, with its **location** standing out as a significant strength, achieving the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well, both at 4. Accommodations are a slightly weaker point, rated at 3.5, while the ratings for professors and internationality are comparable and solid.
This university garners exceptional ratings for its professors, who received a high score of 4.33. Location and student life also score well at 4. Conversely, the institution's weakest areas are internationality and value, both averaging 3.44. Facilities and accommodation present a middle ground with scores around 3.7.
With excellent ratings in accommodation and strong showings in professors and student life, this institution presents a positive picture. Its weakest areas appear to be in facilities and internationality, both receiving moderate scores. The overall value is well-regarded, suggesting a solid educational investment despite some room for improvement in physical resources and global engagement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Outstanding marks are awarded for facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect score. While internationality is a strong point at four, professors and overall value are areas that received moderate ratings.
With an average rating of 4.76/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight supportive professors, a personal learning environment with small classes, and practical, real-world experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights diversity, affordability, and strong alumni networks. Students also recommend it for rigorous programs and convenient international student support.
All nine reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.11/5. Students praise the excellent research environment, high-quality education, and approachable, supportive faculty. The diversity of programs is also a recurring positive theme.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students appreciate the clear specialization options in agronomy and agrifood, allowing informed career choices.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With one review, the average rating is 4/5, reflecting overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Recurring themes include a good atmosphere, quality facilities and sports activities. Some mention mixed feelings about classes, depending on professors.
My experience at KLU has truly been life-changing. This university has given me a second chance and opened the door to a completely new life filled with opportunities. From the very beginning, it has felt like a second home. What makes KLU so special is the people. Every single person here is supportive and genuinely willing to help. The professors are not only highly qualified and professional, but also approachable and always ready to guide you in any academic or professional matter. I have never been in a place like this before. The strong connection with industry, the quality of events, and the incredible network of classmates and alumni create the perfect environment for both personal and professional growth. I will always be grateful to KLU for everything I have experienced here.
First of all, the courses taught in this course are of high quality, partly due to the quality of the speakers in the school. The courses are complete and are in line with current trends. However, the speakers were not all very qualitative, whether in terms of communicating the homework to be done or their lessons. Overall the program is open to international but having been educated at the time of the COVID-19 epidemic, I could not get an idea of the international side of this school. Thus, the Bachelor's at ICN Business School is a fairly versatile course, focused on the different areas that can be found in management (communication, accounting, CV creation workshops and cover letters, etc.) Concerning opportunities, because of the partnerships that the school maintains with many large companies, I find that it is simple having gone through this school to apply for and obtain a work contract, both in France and abroad. the international.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
