IU International University of Applied Sciences vs ICN Business School vs Université de Lorraine vs École Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaire - ENSAIA vs CESI

Side-by-side comparison from 134 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: IU International University of Applied Sciences (4.40)
IU International University of Applied Sciences: wins 3/6 categories
ICN Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Université de Lorraine: wins 0/6 categories
École Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaire - ENSAIA: wins 0/6 categories
CESI: wins 0/6 categories
AMOS Sport Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Campus Lettres et Sciences Humaines de Nancy - Université de Lorraine: wins 3/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: MBA
Best programme: Business Management
Best programme: Engineering
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: BA (hons) Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
3.69
4.00
3.67
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
3.87
4.67
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.43
Win
3.67
4.33
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.44
Win
3.67
3.44
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
3.62
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.32
Win
4.00
3.44
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
3.11
3.50
3.78
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible online study for work-life balance
  • +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
  • +Relevant, high-quality educational content
  • +Diverse and international student body
  • +Affordable and convenient programs
  • +Strong academic reputation and programs
  • +Exceptional academic programs and quality education
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty and researchers
  • +Lively campus with good opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Clear program specialization after common core
  • +Focused agricultural and food industry engineering education

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging professors and quality of classes
  • +Positive university atmosphere and facilities
  • +Excellent sports activities
Cons
  • -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
  • -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
  • -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
  • -Excessive administrative and management issues hinder progress.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors and the institution causes frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources were frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations led to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency are prevalent concerns.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are common complaints.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.

Overall, this institution receives positive evaluations, with its **location** standing out as a significant strength, achieving the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well, both at 4. Accommodations are a slightly weaker point, rated at 3.5, while the ratings for professors and internationality are comparable and solid.

This university garners exceptional ratings for its professors, who received a high score of 4.33. Location and student life also score well at 4. Conversely, the institution's weakest areas are internationality and value, both averaging 3.44. Facilities and accommodation present a middle ground with scores around 3.7.

With excellent ratings in accommodation and strong showings in professors and student life, this institution presents a positive picture. Its weakest areas appear to be in facilities and internationality, both receiving moderate scores. The overall value is well-regarded, suggesting a solid educational investment despite some room for improvement in physical resources and global engagement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Outstanding marks are awarded for facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect score. While internationality is a strong point at four, professors and overall value are areas that received moderate ratings.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights diversity, affordability, and strong alumni networks. Students also recommend it for rigorous programs and convenient international student support.

All nine reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.11/5. Students praise the excellent research environment, high-quality education, and approachable, supportive faculty. The diversity of programs is also a recurring positive theme.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students appreciate the clear specialization options in agronomy and agrifood, allowing informed career choices.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review, the average rating is 4/5, reflecting overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Recurring themes include a good atmosphere, quality facilities and sports activities. Some mention mixed feelings about classes, depending on professors.

Rating distribution
5★
63%
67%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
27%
0%
89%
100%
0%
0%
100%
3★
6%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
The best university in the world

My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.

A great school with a complete program but a communication to review.

First of all, the courses taught in this course are of high quality, partly due to the quality of the speakers in the school. The courses are complete and are in line with current trends. However, the speakers were not all very qualitative, whether in terms of communicating the homework to be done or their lessons. Overall the program is open to international but having been educated at the time of the COVID-19 epidemic, I could not get an idea of ​​the international side of this school. Thus, the Bachelor's at ICN Business School is a fairly versatile course, focused on the different areas that can be found in management (communication, accounting, CV creation workshops and cover letters, etc.) Concerning opportunities, because of the partnerships that the school maintains with many large companies, I find that it is simple having gone through this school to apply for and obtain a work contract, both in France and abroad. the international.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close