IU International University of Applied Sciences vs Macromedia University of Applied Sciences vs New European College vs Hochschule Fresenius vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 166 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible online study for work-life balance
- +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
- +Relevant, high-quality educational content
- +Broadened horizons and excellent networking
- +Valuable real-world experience through company work
- +Supportive and understanding staff
- +Supportive, family-like community and approachable, helpful lecturers
- +Personalized attention and mentorship throughout the academic journey
- +Beyond academics, including city orientation and flexible admissions
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
- +Practical experience and career advancement support
- +Supportive and approachable professors
- +Emphasis on practical, hands-on learning
- +Vibrant international community and activities
- +Strong technology, entrepreneurship, and innovation focus
- +Small classes and personal lecturer/staff experience
- +Excellent value for money and career/life start opportunities
- -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
- -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
- -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
- -Poor quality of education and lecturer qualifications.
- -High tuition fees disproportionate to class availability and contact hours.
- -Unresponsive or ineffective administrative and management support.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication regarding academic and administrative matters.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
- -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt the learning environment.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder academic progress.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and course organization leads to confusion.
This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.
Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, earning a high score. Strong performance is also noted for **Location** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** received the lowest ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Overall, this university receives very positive ratings from students. The strongest areas of performance are Internationality, with a near-perfect score, closely followed by Professors and Location. Accomodation and Facilities represent the weakest, though still generally favorable, aspects of the student experience. The university also scores well in Student Life and Value.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.
Across various aspects, this university demonstrates a strong academic and campus environment. Professors and value for money stand out as the highest-rated areas. Facilities and accommodation also receive very positive scores. Student life and internationality are well-regarded, indicating a good overall experience. The lowest-scoring category, location, suggests room for improvement in this particular aspect.
This institution excels in several key areas, earning perfect scores for Professors and Accomodation, and near-perfect ratings for Facilities and Student Life. Its strongest aspects clearly lie in the academic and living experiences offered. Conversely, the university's Internationality and Value for money received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories, indicating areas where there is room for improvement.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.
With an average rating of 3/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is negative. Students cite concerns about academic quality and value for money. One positive review highlighted broad horizons and networking opportunities.
Students praise NEC for its personal attention from approachable lecturers and a supportive, family-like community. The college exceeded expectations, offering a valuable experience beyond academics.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.63/5, students highlight supportive professors and practical learning through projects. This hands-on approach greatly enhances understanding and employability.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship, small class sizes, and a positive learning experience. No negative feedback was provided.
My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.
Nothing to show
Initially, NEC was not my first choice of university, but one of the top three when choosing a master programme. This was due to a specific programme I was searching for not being offered. As my enquiry progressed, this university quickly became my first choice. The staff was very responsive and fast, made up of some of the kindest people I have met. They were able to guide me through the process and answer all the questions I had. Further, the chancellor has been very hands on from the beginning of the journey, with an open inbox and an open door. He is able to help his students not only in relation to the university but any guidance which is needed for students in a new city or country. The professors chosen have been a part of NEC for many years and bring a wide variety of industry knowledge. Their unique master programme has been exciting, interesting and relevant to the current day scenarios. It has been the right amount of challenging but all worth it. The environment is one of the most welcoming and supportive that I have ever experienced, and I would recommend New European College to anyone who is passionate about their future and education.
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
Nothing to show
Excellent small school with a strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship; small classes; personal experience with lecturers and staff; well-designed curriculum; good lectures and interesting guest lecturers; a lot of traveling if you don't live in Hamburg's south, but manageable for three semesters; excellent value for money compared to UK/US schools, even without receiving one of the many scholarships; financial breakeven in less than two years; well-known in northern Germany, but now more so in central Europe; each class has one or two larger successful startups, with founders frequently giving lectures on campus; the alumni network feels more like a family than a pure "business network"; the new CEO is driving growth; and there are plenty of opportunities and support provided for extracurricular activities, initiatives, etc.
