International School of Management vs Hochschule Fresenius vs Brooklyn College - BC vs General Assembly vs School16

Side-by-side comparison from 288 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: General Assembly (5.00)
International School of Management: wins 3/6 categories
Hochschule Fresenius: wins 0/6 categories
Brooklyn College - BC: wins 0/6 categories
General Assembly: wins 3/6 categories
School16: wins 0/6 categories
Chegg Skills: wins 0/6 categories
TETR College of Business: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Idstein, Germany
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics
New York City, United States
4.10
Read more reviews
268 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
New York City, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
New York City, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
New York City, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
New York City, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Management & Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.64
3.67
4.40
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Location
4.64
5.00
4.10
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.75
Professors
4.82
Win
4.00
4.28
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.40
Internationality
4.82
Win
3.67
4.14
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.60
Student life
4.50
3.33
4.31
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Value
4.73
Win
4.00
4.13
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.40
Accommodation
4.64
3.00
4.16
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert professors and quality cohorts
  • +Flexible learning and personalized support
  • +Global exposure and networking opportunities
  • +Relevant and varied course content
  • +Helpful and educated faculty
  • +Supportive university staff
  • +Knowledgeable, accessible, and supportive professors
  • +Strong sense of community and diverse friendships
  • +Value for money and flexible programs
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Abundant study resources and learning activities
  • +Networking opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Experiential learning and business creation
  • +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
  • +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
Cons
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.

With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.

Student life and professors are the standout strengths, both receiving high marks. The university also performs well in internationality, accommodation, and value. Location and facilities are rated competently, though they represent the lower end of the spectrum compared to other evaluated aspects.

Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.

With ~99% positive feedback, students highlight accessible, knowledgeable professors, flexible programs, and a strong sense of community. The campus is praised for its beauty and modern facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.

Rating distribution
5★
64%
33%
10%
100%
0%
0%
60%
4★
36%
67%
89%
0%
0%
0%
20%
3★
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
20%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Just starting and very happy

I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.

Well structured course

Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Loving it here!

Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close