University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs The Bucharest University of Economic Studies - ASE Bucuresti vs Ovidius University of Constanta - UOC vs Andrei Şaguna University of Constanţa vs Spiru Haret University
Side-by-side comparison from 175 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
- +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
- +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
- +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Comprehensive and challenging curriculum
- +Extensive resources and research opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Flexible distance learning and accessible study resources
- +Good teachers and interactive courses
- +Convenient location and modern facilities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
- -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
- -Poor student treatment and perceived corruption.
- -Limited extracurricular opportunities.
Nothing to show
- -Ineffective communication and poor administrative support from the school.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources for learning.
- -Unengaging teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum content.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.
The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.
Overall, this institution demonstrates a strong performance in several key areas. Its professors and internationality are particularly well-regarded, both receiving a perfect score of 4. Conversely, facilities, student life, and accommodation present opportunities for improvement, each scoring 3.2. The university also scores solidly in location (3.8) and offers good value (3.6).
Nothing to show
This institution receives a commendable average rating, with its **Location** being its strongest asset at 4.2. **Professors** also scored highly at 4.0. Conversely, **Internationality** presented the weakest area with a rating of 3.2. Other aspects like Facilities, Value, and Accommodation fall within a similar mid-range, with Student Life also slightly lower.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.
~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.
University reviews are largely positive (~60%), with students praising knowledgeable faculty and comprehensive curricula. Some feedback (~20%) indicates a need for more practical experience and career guidance, with one review expressing strong dissatisfaction with faculty and system corruption.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~80%). Students highlight accessible distance learning and flexible scheduling. Some note decent academic quality and good teachers, though it's not considered the absolute best.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.
Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Available teachers for all course issues. Location near your home town. Courses take place according to the curriculum. The classes are interactive and complex. With some of my colleagues, we still keep in touch and we are very close.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show