University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs Romanian-American University vs 'Dunarea de Jos' University of Galati - DJUG vs Faculty of Economics and Business Administration - FSEGA
Side-by-side comparison from 193 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
- +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
- +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
- +Strong academic programs with knowledgeable professors
- +Well-structured curriculum balancing theory and practical application
- +Excellent career opportunities and professional development
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
- +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
- +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
- +Diverse faculty options and dedicated teaching staff.
- +Practical learning, job prospects, and useful skill development.
- +Relaxed atmosphere and helpful instructors.
- +Supportive and accessible professors
- +Relevant and enriching programmes
- +Opportunities for personal growth and networking
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of student-centered focus and administrative neglect.
- -Poor value for money with a perception of a profit-driven institution.
- -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from administration.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities.
- -Limited career services and internship opportunities.
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are commonly cited.
- -Inconsistent or unengaging teaching quality impacts learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.61, and **Student Life**, with a score of 4.38. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, rated at 3.78. Other assessed aspects like Professors (3.88), Accomodation (4.07), Value (4.04), and Internationality (3.79) fall within a moderate to good range.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
The university receives strong ratings across most surveyed areas. Location stands out as its strongest point, followed closely by professors and value. Student life and accommodation are also rated highly. Internationality and facilities are areas where improvements could be considered, as they received the lowest scores. Overall, the institution presents a positive picture with notable strengths in key aspects of the student experience.
This university garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Value, all receiving ratings above 4.8. Student Life and Accommodation also score well, with 4.5 and 4.2 respectively. Professors are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be Internationality, which at 3.83 is the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.
Approximately 74% of 95 reviews are positive, citing structured curricula, knowledgeable professors, and good professional opportunities. A small portion (around 2%) expressed concerns about outdated facilities and perceived institutional priorities.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.
Most reviews are positive (~95%), highlighting dedicated teaching staff, diverse faculties, and good career prospects. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
With ~100% positive feedback, students highlight great teachers, modern facilities, and strong communication. They also praise student organizations and a supportive campus atmosphere. No negative reviews were provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.
Last year I chose ASE with a pinch of salt, because many of my acquaintances told me from their experience that it is a university where neither the teachers, nor the students are involved in their work. That couldn't be farther from the truth, at least for the German Business Administration faculty where I study. The students here are, though sometimes lazy, really creative and with a desire to put into practice the information that they get from the courses. The professors are really great at sharing their beliefs about different topics and they also put the student in some mind-blowing scenarios, where they really have to activate their brains to come up with a sensible answer. I remember with pleasure how we did unique role-play games during macroeconomics classes, games which made me come to a better understanding of how the market works. I also had quite an annoying experience that I'm going to share with you. It's about the marketing teacher whose courses I attended during the second semester. This person contradicted himself a lot of times and that made him look like he doesn't have a clue what he is talking about. In addition to this, he used to mock the students who answered incorrectly to his questions, without even providing himself the right answer in the end. All in all, the entire collective of both students and teachers is welcoming and here at ASE can truly be achieved long-lasting friendships. It's an underrated faculty that I definitely recommend to all the people that are interested in studying smartly.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
