University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs Transilvania University of Brasov - TUB vs Romanian-American University vs Spiru Haret University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS
Side-by-side comparison from 93 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
- +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
- +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
- +Supportive and inspiring teachers
- +Engaging campus and student life
- +Beautiful city with many opportunities
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
- +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
- +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
- +Accessible and flexible for working students
- +Competent and available teachers
- +Modern facilities and engaging courses
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and accessible professors
- +Relevant and enriching programmes
- +Opportunities for personal growth and networking
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
- -Poor course relevance and teaching quality.
- -Lack of support and poor treatment for international students.
- -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are commonly cited.
- -Inconsistent or unengaging teaching quality impacts learning.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Location**, boasting an impressive score. Other positively rated aspects include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both receiving a solid 4. Areas with slightly lower scores, representing opportunities for improvement, are **Accomodation** and **Facilities**. Ratings for Internationality and Value are also in a similar, moderate range.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution garners its highest marks for Professors and Location, both receiving a strong 4.25. Its Value is also notable at a perfect 4. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality present areas for potential improvement, each scoring 3.25. Facilities and Accommodations fall in the mid-range with solid 3.75 ratings.
Nothing to show
This university garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Value, all receiving ratings above 4.8. Student Life and Accommodation also score well, with 4.5 and 4.2 respectively. Professors are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be Internationality, which at 3.83 is the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.
Most reviews (70%) are positive, highlighting study programs, campus life, and supportive teachers. Negative feedback (20%) mentions useless courses and poor teacher engagement. The average rating is 3.8/5.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.
With a 4/5 average rating from 4 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight accessible learning and available teachers. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
With ~100% positive feedback, students highlight great teachers, modern facilities, and strong communication. They also praise student organizations and a supportive campus atmosphere. No negative reviews were provided.
Nothing to show
My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Available teachers for all course issues. Location near your home town. Courses take place according to the curriculum. The classes are interactive and complex. With some of my colleagues, we still keep in touch and we are very close.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
