Budapest University of Technology and Economics - BME vs Eötvös Loránd University - ELTE vs Corvinus University of Budapest - BCE vs Semmelweis University - SE vs Budapest Metropolitan University
Side-by-side comparison from 103 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic standards and quality engineering programs
- +Capable and friendly professors
- +Supportive study environment and technological innovations
- +Excellent professors and clear explanations
- +Rigorous and well-structured programs
- +Broad and interesting academic opportunities
- +Strong economics and business programs
- +Supportive and expert faculty and staff
- +International atmosphere and location
- +Extensive opportunities for student development and engagement.
- +Supportive and cooperative faculty fostering a positive learning environment.
- +Strong reputation and international focus in health sciences.
- +Unique, broad, and exploratory learning approach
- +Modern, open-minded environment
- +Expert, helpful, and approachable faculty.
- +Strong academic programs and curriculum.
- +Cooperative university administration and management.
- +Experienced professors and real-world professional insights
- +Bilingual program availability
- -Administrative and organizational issues, combined with underpaid and unmotivated staff, create a negative learning environment.
- -Outdated study programs fail to meet current academic standards.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently cited.
- -There is a general dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
- -Lack of practical skills and real-world application in the curriculum.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a common complaint.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from staff and administration is frustrating.
- -A lack of practical application and outdated curriculum are frequently mentioned.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -Poor communication and inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
- -Limited career support and job prospects after graduation are a concern.
This university garners impressive marks, particularly excelling in its **Location**, which achieved a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also stand out with robust ratings. While the university performs well in **Internationality** and **Value**, areas like **Professors** and **Accommodations** received comparatively lower, though still respectable, scores.
This university garners high marks in several key areas, with **Location** standing out as its strongest attribute at 4.63. **Internationality** and **Value** also received very favorable scores, reflecting strengths in global appeal and perceived worth. Conversely, **Accommodations** present the weakest area, scoring notably lower than other categories. **Professors** and **Student Life** are rated positively, indicating solid performance in teaching and campus experience.
The university demonstrates excellent performance in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks. Facilities and student life are also rated highly. While accommodations are generally positive, they represent the lowest-rated aspect of the university experience. Overall, the institution presents a strong offering with particularly notable strengths in its physical environment and student engagement.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its **Value** and **Internationality**, scoring a perfect 5 and a near-perfect 4.67 respectively. **Facilities** also rank highly at 4. Areas showing potential for improvement include **Student Life**, with a rating of 2.67, and **Professors** and **Accomodation**, both at a moderate 3. The **Location** is well-regarded at 4.33.
This university presents a generally positive but mixed picture. Its strongest areas include Internationality, scoring a solid 4. Professors also received a commendable rating of 3.67. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation are its weakest points, both averaging a 3. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated moderately at 3.33.
Overall, this institution garners excellent feedback. Professors and value for money received perfect scores, representing its strongest areas. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all highly rated, achieving a consistent 4.67. Internationality also scores favorably at 4.67, indicating a strong global presence. There are no notably weak areas identified in these ratings.
This university demonstrates a striking dichotomy in its ratings. Its professors and perceived value are exceptionally strong, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, accommodations represent a significant weakness, with a score of zero. Facilities and student life also received lower marks, while the location and internationality were rated moderately well.
With an average rating of 4.12/5, approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic programs, capable professors, and a good study environment. A small portion of feedback (~3%) mentions issues with outdated facilities or organizational challenges.
Most university student feedback (approximately 74%) is positive, highlighting rigorous programs, knowledgeable professors, and a good community. Some students noted minor administrative disorganization and issues with professors' English proficiency.
With an average rating of 4.28/5 from 18 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong Economics and Business programs, international atmosphere, and a strategic campus location. No negative reviews were recorded.
All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.33/5 stars. Students highlight endless opportunities for improvement, research, exchange programs, and social gatherings. Teachers are described as cooperative and caring, fostering a serene learning environment.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing a lack of technical skills and real-world experience. Positive comments highlight the university's unique, modern, and open-minded approach.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Recurring themes highlight well-qualified, helpful professors and a positive university atmosphere.
With one review available, the program is highly praised (~100% positive), noting seasoned professors and practical experience. There is no negative feedback to report.
When I was admitted to BME, I had high expectations. Coming from a successful high school background with strong foundations in algebra, informatics, and physics, I was confident and motivated to thrive in a top European engineering university. Unfortunately, my experience at BME has not lived up to my expectations—especially as an international student. 1. Administrative and Structural Discrimination One of the biggest disappointments has been the clear separation between Hungarian, Erasmus, and international students. Almost every event is divided by nationality, creating silos instead of an inclusive academic community. Even basic facilities like dormitories are unequally allocated—Hungarian students are placed near the campus, while many international students, including myself, are forced to live in dormitories located in entirely different cities. This makes commuting to university both time-consuming and costly. Administrative support is also extremely lacking for non-Hungarians. The bureaucracy is slow, confusing, and often indifferent toward international students’ concerns. It often feels like we are not valued or even acknowledged unless we are fluent in Hungarian. 2. Unequal Treatment and Favoritism Although BME promotes itself as an international institution, there is clear favoritism in student selection and treatment—particularly towards Arabic students. While the university’s rector is of Arabic origin, it seems that this has led to an overwhelming admission of students from the same background (up to 80% in some departments), and unfortunately, favoritism in how rules are applied. There are PhD students, also from similar backgrounds, who act as teaching assistants and display bias based on religion or ethnicity. I personally faced hostility after expressing differing views in a discussion, and it escalated to verbal and physical aggression from fellow students. Even worse, some instructors allow academic dishonesty to take place openly, turning a blind eye when favored students cheat during exams. 3. Quality of Teaching Academically, the quality of instruction has also been underwhelming. Many professors are very senior, but unfortunately, many are disconnected from modern technological developments. They are often unapproachable, angry, and do not welcome questions. Some professors struggle with basic English, which makes lectures difficult to follow, especially in technical subjects. This severely affects the learning experience for international students. --- Final Thoughts If you're considering studying at BME as an international student, especially if you're seeking a collaborative, forward-thinking academic environment and fair treatment, I urge you to do thorough research and consider your options carefully. My personal experience has been marked by exclusion, inequality, and a lack of academic and personal support. Higher education should be a space for growth, innovation, and inclusion,but sadly, that has not been my experience at BME.
There is a big variety of departments to choose from, including ones that are the only available ones within the country. Unfortunately on the other hand, the organization and communication of the institution was not on the level of quality that one would expect from one of the top universities in the country. Regarding the quality of education, I had very mixed experiences as there are big differences within the departments and among the professors.
Previously studying in the USA, moving to Budapest was a complete culture shock. However, this university offers a vigorous program with ample opportunities for students who want a career in diplomacy and foreign affairs. I feel constantly challenged and surrounded by bright-minded thinkers. Throwing myself into a new country, new culture, and new language has allowed me to truly be immersed in this field of study. While the program is in English, there are ample opportunities for additional foreign language classes. The fact that this university offers scholarships and the base price of tuition is already so low, is an added bonus.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
