Universitat Oberta de Catalunya - UOC vs Akhbar El Youm Academy vs Yaba College of Technology - YabaTech vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Ahmad Dahlan University - UAD

Side-by-side comparison from 76 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya - UOC: wins 0/7 categories
Akhbar El Youm Academy: wins 0/7 categories
Yaba College of Technology - YabaTech: wins 0/7 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 6/7 categories
Ahmad Dahlan University - UAD: wins 1/7 categories
Ahram Canadian University: wins 0/7 categories
Università degli Studi della Basilicata - UNIBAS: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Best programme: Microbiology
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Management
Best programme: HR Management and Leadership
Category ratings
Facilities
3.15
Not rated
3.21
4.67
Win
4.50
2.00
2.00
Location
3.85
Not rated
4.24
5.00
Win
4.25
1.50
4.00
Professors
3.69
Not rated
4.14
4.33
4.50
Win
2.33
4.00
Internationality
3.77
Not rated
3.68
5.00
Win
4.50
2.00
3.00
Student life
2.70
Not rated
3.88
4.33
Win
4.25
1.83
2.00
Value
3.73
Not rated
4.18
5.00
Win
3.50
2.33
3.00
Accommodation
3.22
Not rated
3.21
5.00
Win
4.00
1.83
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible online model and well-structured virtual platform
  • +Autonomy and personalized learning pace
  • +Accessible and responsive faculty support

Nothing to show

  • +High academic standard with theory and practicals
  • +Conducive learning environment and campus life
  • +Supportive and committed lecturers
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Excellent academic foundation and personal growth opportunities.
  • +Supportive and dynamic lecturer-student interaction.
  • +Strong Islamic religious curriculum alongside formal education.
  • +Practical skills and real-world application focus
  • +Supportive professors and creative encouragement
  • +Modern facilities and friendly atmosphere

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -- Administrative and communication issues lead to confusion and lack of support.
  • -- Unclear and inconsistent assessment criteria hinder academic progress.
  • -- Disorganized content and poor web usability create a frustrating learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Students are frustrated by administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
  • -There is widespread dissatisfaction with outdated facilities and a lack of resources.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or unengaging.
  • -Lack of transparency and fairness in grading.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of modern industry relevance.
  • -Limited practical skill development for future careers.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution received its highest marks for location, with a score of 3.85. Internationality and value were also strong points, both scoring above 3.7. Conversely, student life presented the weakest area, registering a 2.7. Facilities and accommodation also received mid-range scores. Professors were rated favorably, indicating a generally positive, albeit uneven, university experience.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location** (4.24) and the **value** it offers (4.18), alongside excellent ratings for its **professors** (4.14). Conversely, **facilities** and **accommodation** received the lowest scores, both at 3.21. Student life and internationality are rated moderately well, with scores of 3.88 and 3.68 respectively, indicating room for improvement in the physical campus experience.

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

An institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its facilities, professors, and international appeal, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Student life and location also score well at 4.25. However, the university's value proposition registers as a comparative weakness, with a rating of 3.5, while accommodation sits at a respectable 4.

This institution's assessment reveals a varied landscape of strengths and weaknesses. Its strongest areas, both scoring a solid 2, are Facilities and Internationality. Conversely, Location stands out as the weakest point, with a rating of 1.5. Professors and Value show moderate performance, while Student Life and Accommodation fall slightly below average.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility and a well-structured online platform. A small portion of feedback (~12%) is negative, mentioning issues with instruction clarity, administrative errors, and customer service.

Nothing to show

University reviews show strong satisfaction, with ~93% positive feedback. Students praise the high academic standards, committed lecturers, and engaging campus life. A small number mention academic pressure and compressed courses.

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

With 100% positive reviews, students report transformative experiences and strong academic/personal growth. They highlight enjoyable studies, effective teaching, and dynamic lecturer-student interaction.

With an average rating of 2.17/5, ~67% of reviews are negative. Students express frustration with outdated curriculum, lack of AI and modern tool instruction, and unfair grading. A few positive reviews highlight strong academic foundations and supportive professors.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
39%
0%
34%
100%
25%
17%
0%
4★
36%
0%
55%
0%
75%
17%
0%
3★
12%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Good online option

I started the UOC because I was very interested in Law, however I was already doing a career in a university in person. This undoubtedly, and after two years in it, it is no longer a problem. The UOC gives you the possibility to manage your time to your liking, the material is good (although it could be better and keep updating), and the jobs do not require a giant effort (it depends a lot on the subject). I definitely recommend it if you want to learn at your own pace.

Nothing to show

The school environment

Yaba College of Technology is a student - friendly environment to be, ranging from the lectures to the extra-curricular activities. I studied Architecture, HND and I can say, I learnt alot from the magnificent lecturers from theories to practicals. Also, other gained knowledge from service courses were apt. More so, the well planned zoning of the school makes it easier to move from a place to another.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close